Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 May;21(5):956-63.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2120-z. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws

Maximiliano Aguiar Porto  1 , Patrícia Silva, Rodrigo Rosa, José Batista Volpon, Antônio Carlos Shimano, Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula, Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws

Maximiliano Aguiar Porto et al. Eur Spine J. 2012 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Self-drilling screws (SDS) and self-tapping screws (STS) allow for quicker bone insertion and are associated with increased anchorage. This is an experimental in vivo comparison of anterior cervical SDS and STS in the post-insertion acute and chronic phases.

Methods: Thirty C2-C6 vertebrae from six Santa Inês hair sheep were used. Each screw design was randomly assigned to five of each spinal level. Insertion torque was measured using a torque device. Three animals were killed in each phase. Vertebrae were randomly assigned to pullout tests and histomorphometrical bone-screw interface evaluation (percent screw-bone contact and bone density inside and outside the threaded area). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: SDS insertion torque was greater than STS (P = 0.0001). SDS pullout strength was significantly greater than STS in the acute and chronic phases (P = 0.0001, 0.0003, respectively). SDS percent screw-bone contact and inside area bone density were significantly greater in both phases. No outside area bone density differences were observed in either phase.

Conclusions: SDS had higher insertion torque and better anchorage than STS in both phases. SDS percent bone-screw contact and inside area bone density were higher in both phases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Photograph of self-tapping (a) and self-drilling (b) anterior cervical screws
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagram illustrating the experimental set-up for pullout testing. Right details of the screw–pullout device connection
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Micrograph of the trabecular bone–implant interface illustrating the histomorphometrical measurement. The dotted line indicates the bone–implant contact. The smaller rectangle delimits the area selected for the measurement of bone percentage inside the screw thread. The larger rectangle delimits the cancellous bone area outside the screw thread. Alizarin red and Stevenel’s blue staining. ×25 magnification
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Graph showing the insertion torque (mean and standard deviation) of self-tapping screws (STS) and self-drilling screws (SDS) in the acute phase. The asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Graph showing the pullout strength (mean and standard deviation) of self-tapping (STS) and self-drilling (SDS) screws after insertion (acute phase) and 8 weeks later. The asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (*P < 0.0001 and ** P < 0.0003)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Graph showing the percentage of bone inside the screw thread area (mean and standard deviation) of self-tapping screws (STS) and self-drilling screws (SDS) after insertion (acute phase) and 8 weeks later. The asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (*P < 0.0005 and **P < 0.013)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Graph showing the percentage of bone–implant contact (mean and standard deviation) of self-tapping screws (STS) and self-drilling screws (SDS) after insertion (acute phase) and 8 weeks later. The asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (*P < 0.004 and **P < 0.04)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Graph showing the percentage of bone outside the screw thread area (mean and standard deviation) of self-tapping screws (STS) and self-drilling screws (SDS) after insertion (acute phase) and 8 weeks later. No statistical difference was found
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Micrographs of the trabecular bone–implant interface illustrating the histomorphometric results in the acute and chronic phases. a Self-tapping screw (STS) in the acute phase. b STS in the chronic phase (8 weeks). c Self-drilling screw (SDS) in the acute phase. d SDS in the chronic phase (8 weeks). Alizarin red and Stevenel’s blue staining. ×25 magnification
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Micrographs of the trabecular bone–implant interface illustrating the histomorphometrical results in the acute and chronic phases. a Self-tapping screws (STS) in the acute phase. b STS in the chronic phase (8 weeks). c Self-drilling screws (SDS) in the acute phase. d SDS in the chronic phase (8 weeks). Alizarin red and Stevenel’s blue staining. ×25 magnification
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aebi M, Zuber K, Marchesi D. Treatment of cervical spine injuries with anterior plating. Indications, techniques, and results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991;16:S38–S45. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199103001-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Champy M, Lodde JP, Schmitt R, et al. Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg. 1978;6:14–21. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0503(78)80062-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM, et al. Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng. 1996;118:391–398. doi: 10.1115/1.2796022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chavassieux P, Pastoureau P, Boivin G, et al. Dose effects on ewe bone remodeling of short-term sodium fluoride administration—a histomorphometric and biochemical study. Bone. 1991;12:421–427. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(91)90031-D. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conrad BP, Cordista AG, Horodyski M, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the pullout strength of cervical screws. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:506–510. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000140196.99995.65. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types