Wingspan stents for the treatment of symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis in small intracranial vessels: safety and efficacy evaluation
- PMID: 22173759
- PMCID: PMC7964796
- DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2772
Wingspan stents for the treatment of symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis in small intracranial vessels: safety and efficacy evaluation
Abstract
Background and purpose: Until now, endovascular treatment of symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis in small intracranial arteries (≤2.5 mm) was limited. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the treatment by using Wingspan stents in arteries of this caliber.
Materials and methods: From March 2007 to July 2010, 53 symptomatic intracranial stenoses with narrowing of at least 50% in 53 patients were treated by using Wingspan stents. Clinical manifestations and imaging features were recorded.
Results: The technical success rate was 98.1%. There were no serious complications, with the exception of 1 patient who experienced a small cerebral hemorrhage caused by perforation of microwire. Thirty-nine patients (74%) were available for follow-up imaging with DSA. ISR was documented in 13 of these patients, including 2 patients with symptomatic ISR. The median length of the vascular lesions was 5.39 mm, and patients whose vascular lesions were longer than 5.39 mm had a much higher incidence of ISR than patients whose vascular lesions were shorter than 5.39 mm (53% versus 15%, respectively). The median ratio of the reference artery diameter to the stent diameter was 0.78, and patients whose ratio was smaller than 0.78 had a much higher incidence of ISR than patients whose ratio was larger than 0.78 (53% versus 15%, respectively).
Conclusions: In our series, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement of small intracranial arteries by using Wingspan stents was safe. The ISR rate was relatively high; most patients having ISR were asymptomatic. Further follow-up is needed to assess the long-term efficacy of this procedure.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 14;14:1170110. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1170110. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37521300 Free PMC article.
-
Angiographic patterns of Wingspan in-stent restenosis.Neurosurgery. 2008 Jul;63(1):23-7; discussion 27-8. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000335067.53190.A2. Neurosurgery. 2008. PMID: 18728565
-
A single-center study of Wingspan stents for symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis of the middle cerebral artery.J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Mar;20(3):362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.03.033. Epub 2012 Dec 8. J Clin Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23228656 Clinical Trial.
-
Target lesion revascularization after wingspan: assessment of safety and durability.Stroke. 2009 Jan;40(1):106-10. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.525774. Epub 2008 Oct 16. Stroke. 2009. PMID: 18927447
-
Device profile of the Wingspan Stent System for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease: overview of its safety and efficacy.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Mar;17(3):167-171. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1732813. Epub 2020 Feb 23. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020. PMID: 32073915 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in symptomatic intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis: a meta-analysis.Front Neurol. 2024 Nov 5;15:1389254. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1389254. eCollection 2024. Front Neurol. 2024. PMID: 39563776 Free PMC article.
-
Detailed analysis of periprocedural strokes in patients undergoing intracranial stenting in Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS).Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2682-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661173. Epub 2012 Sep 13. Stroke. 2012. PMID: 22984008 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Wingspan stent delivery catheter fracture and the TRAP technique for endovascular salvage.Interv Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;24(1):106-110. doi: 10.1177/1591019917737734. Epub 2017 Nov 10. Interv Neuroradiol. 2018. PMID: 29125024 Free PMC article.
-
The experiences of balloon-expandable stent in symptomatic stenosis of middle cerebral artery.Springerplus. 2016 Aug 24;5(1):1413. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3078-4. eCollection 2016. Springerplus. 2016. PMID: 27625968 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 14;14:1170110. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1170110. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37521300 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Moreno R, Fernández C, Alfonso F, et al. . Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small vessels: a meta-analysis from 11 randomized studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1964– 72 - PubMed
-
- Costa MA, Sabate M, Staico R, et al. . Anatomical and physiologic assessments in patients with small coronary artery disease: final results of the Physiologic and Anatomical Evaluation Prior to and After Stent Implantation in Small Coronary Vessels (PHANTOM) trial. Am Heart J 2007; 153: 296. e1– 7 - PubMed
-
- Moussavian M, Casterella PJ, Teirstein PS. Restenosis after angioplasty. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2001; 3: 103– 13 - PubMed
-
- Elezi S, Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, et al. . Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronary stent placement. Circulation 1998; 98: 1875– 80 - PubMed
-
- Bose A, Hartmann M, Henkes H, et al. . A novel, self-expanding, nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses: the Wingspan study. Stroke 2007; 38: 1531– 37 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical