Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;2(4):203-15.

Evaluation of health research: measuring costs and socioeconomic effects

Affiliations

Evaluation of health research: measuring costs and socioeconomic effects

Kerstin Roback et al. Int J Prev Med. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: The topic of this work is health research evaluation including basic and clinical medical research, as well as healthcare research. The main objects are to explore possible approaches for valuing research in economic terms and to prepare an analytical model for evaluation of health research using the Swedish context. The study also aims to identify potential effects and their significance, and to provide a basis for discussions about the effects of research investments.

Methods: The study has reviewed ten articles indicating positive effects, in the form of improved health and economic growth. The study also developed a model applied to Swedish health research.

Results: The review indicates that positive effects, in the form of improved health and economic growth, have a value that greatly exceeds the costs of the research investments. The tentative model applied to Swedish health research also indicates predominantly positive returns, but in a lower range than the review would imply. Methodological problems, however, entail major uncertainty in the cited results.

Conclusions: Accurate determination of the economic value of research would require significantly better basic data and better knowledge of relationships between research, implementation of new knowledge, and health effects. Information in support of decisions about future allocation of research resources is preferably produced by a combination of general analyses and strategically selected case studies.

Keywords: Innovation; Medical research; Policy-making; Social impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bunker JP, Frazier HS, Mosteller F. Improving health: measuring effects of medical care. Milbank Q. 1994;72(2):225–58. - PubMed
    1. Cutler DM, McClellan M. Is technological change in medicine worth it? Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20(5):11–29. - PubMed
    1. Lichtenberg FR. The impact of new drug launches on longevity: evidence from longitudinal, disease-level data from 52 countries, 1982-2001. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2005;5(1):47–73. - PubMed
    1. Buxton M, Hanney S, Morris S, Sundmacher L, Mestre-Ferrandiz J, Garau M, et al. London: UK Evaluation Forum; 2008. Medical Research: What's it worth? Estimating the economic benefits from medical research in the UK; p. 103.
    1. Wooding S, Hanney S, Buxton M, Grant J. Payback arising from research funding: evaluation of the Arthritis Research Campaign. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44(9):1145–56. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources