Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 22177579
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70296-0
Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is more sensitive for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions than is cytology, but detection of HPV by DNA screening in two screening rounds 5 years apart has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to assess whether HPV DNA testing in the first screen decreases detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 or worse, CIN grade 2 or worse, and cervical cancer in the second screening.
Methods: In this randomised trial, women aged 29-56 years participating in the cervical screening programme in the Netherlands were randomly assigned to receive HPV DNA (GP5+/6+-PCR method) and cytology co-testing or cytology testing alone, from January, 1999, to September, 2002. Randomisation (in a 1:1 ratio) was done with computer-generated random numbers after the cervical specimen had been taken. At the second screening 5 years later, HPV DNA and cytology co-testing was done in both groups; researchers were masked to the patient's assignment. The primary endpoint was the number of CIN grade 3 or worse detected. Analysis was done by intention to screen. The trial is now finished and is registered, number ISRCTN20781131.
Findings: 22,420 women were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 22 518 to the control group; 19 999 in the intervention group and 20,106 in the control group were eligible for analysis at the first screen. At the second screen, 19 579 women in the intervention group and 19,731 in the control group were eligible, of whom 16,750 and 16,743, respectively, attended the second screen. In the second round, CIN grade 3 or worse was less common in the intervention group than in the control group (88 of 19 579 in the intervention group vs 122 of 19,731 in the control group; relative risk 0·73, 95% CI 0·55-0·96; p=0·023). Cervical cancer was also less common in the intervention group than in the control group (four of 19 579 in the intervention group vs 14 of 19,731; 0·29, 0·10-0·87; p=0·031). In the baseline round, detection of CIN grade 3 or worse did not differ significantly between groups (171 of 19 999 vs 150 of 20,106; 1·15, 0·92-1·43; p=0·239) but was significantly more common in women with normal cytology (34 of 19,286 vs 12 of 19,373; 2·85, 1·47-5·49; p=0·001). Furthermore, significantly more cases of CIN grade 2 or worse were detected in the intervention group than in the control group (267 of 19 999 vs 215 of 20,106; 1·25, 1·05-1·50; p=0·015). In the second screen, fewer HPV16-positive CIN grade 3 or worse were detected in the intervention group than in the control group (17 of 9481 vs 35 of 9354; 0·48, 0·27-0·85; p=0·012); detection of non-HPV16-positive CIN grade 3 or worse did not differ between groups (25 of 9481 vs 25 of 9354; 0·99, 0·57-1·72; p=1·00). The cumulative detection of CIN grade 3 or worse and CIN grade 2 or worse did not differ significantly between study arms, neither for the whole study group (CIN grade 3 or worse: 259 of 19 999 vs 272 of 20,106; 0·96, 0·81-1·14, p=0·631; CIN grade 2 or worse: 427 of 19 999 vs 399 of 20,106; 1·08, 0·94-1·24; p=0·292), nor for subgroups of women invited for the first time (CIN grade 3 or worse in women aged 29-33 years: 102 of 3139 vs 105 of 3128; 0·97, 0·74-1·27; CIN grade 2 or worse in women aged 29-33 years: 153 of 3139 vs 151 of 3128; 1·01, 0·81-1·26; CIN grade 3 or worse in women aged 34-56 years: 157 of 16,860 vs 167 of 16 978; 0·95, 0·76-1·18; CIN grade 2 or worse in women aged 34-56 years: 274 of 16,860 vs 248 of 16 978; 1·11, 0·94-1·32).
Interpretation: Implementation of HPV DNA testing in cervical screening leads to earlier detection of clinically relevant CIN grade 2 or worse, which when adequately treated, improves protection against CIN grade 3 or worse and cervical cancer. Early detection of high-grade cervical legions caused by HPV16 was a major component of this benefit. Our results lend support to the use of HPV DNA testing for all women aged 29 years and older.
Funding: Zorg Onderzoek Nederland (Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development).
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
How might HPV testing be integrated into cervical screening?Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):8-10. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70334-5. Epub 2011 Dec 14. Lancet Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22177578 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Adding HPV testing to cytology screening reduced ≥ grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia at 5 years.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):JC2-6, JC2-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-02006. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22801698 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):880-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22. Lancet Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21865084 Clinical Trial.
-
Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Dec 2;101(23):1612-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp367. Epub 2009 Nov 9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009. PMID: 19903804 Clinical Trial.
-
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230. Health Technol Assess. 2014. PMID: 24762804 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):172-83. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9. Epub 2014 Jan 14. Lancet Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24433684 Review.
-
The use of human papillomavirus DNA methylation in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.EBioMedicine. 2019 Dec;50:246-259. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.10.053. Epub 2019 Nov 12. EBioMedicine. 2019. PMID: 31732479 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and determinants of human papillomavirus infection and cervical lesions in HIV-positive women in Kenya.Br J Cancer. 2012 Oct 23;107(9):1624-30. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.441. Epub 2012 Oct 2. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 23033006 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge and acceptability of pap smears, self-sampling and HPV vaccination among adult women in Kenya.PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040766. Epub 2012 Jul 10. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22808257 Free PMC article.
-
Gynecological cancer: More evidence supporting human papillomavirus testing.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 14;9(3):131-2. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.16. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22330684 No abstract available.
-
Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Genotypes among Women During 2015-2020 in Mashhad, Iran.Arch Iran Med. 2023 Aug 1;26(8):419-426. doi: 10.34172/aim.2023.64. Arch Iran Med. 2023. PMID: 38301103 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of HPV E6 oncoprotein from urine via a novel immunochromatographic assay.PLoS One. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0232105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232105. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32320451 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous