Meta-analysis of imaging techniques for the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome type I
- PMID: 22177715
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.035
Meta-analysis of imaging techniques for the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome type I
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of imaging techniques in aiding and confirming the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I.
Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies that evaluated the effectiveness of 3 different imaging techniques in aiding the diagnosis of CRPS type I. A systematic search in bibliographical databases resulted in 24 studies with 1,916 participants.
Results: To determine the effectiveness of each imaging technique, we determined the average specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value and then statistically compared them using the analysis of variance statistical test, which indicated that compared with magnetic resonance imaging and plain film radiography, triple-phase bone scan had a significantly better sensitivity and negative predictive values. However, there appeared to be no statistical significance between imaging techniques when we evaluated specificity and positive predictive value using the analysis of variance test.
Conclusions: The findings of this meta-analysis support the use of triple-phase bone scan in ruling out CRPS type I, owing to its greater sensitivity and higher negative predictive value than both magnetic resonance imaging and plain film radiography.
Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic I.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Imaging in early posttraumatic complex regional pain syndrome: a comparison of diagnostic methods.Clin J Pain. 2007 Jun;23(5):449-57. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31805c9e66. Clin J Pain. 2007. PMID: 17515744 Clinical Trial.
-
Predictive value of symptom level measurements for complex regional pain syndrome type I.Eur J Pain. 2005 Feb;9(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.04.003. Eur J Pain. 2005. PMID: 15629874 Clinical Trial.
-
Complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Some treatments assessed versus placebo, limited efficacy.Prescrire Int. 2009 Dec;18(104):267-71. Prescrire Int. 2009. PMID: 20027710
-
Complex regional pain syndrome underdiagnosed.J Fam Pract. 2005 Jun;54(6):524-32. J Fam Pract. 2005. PMID: 15939004 Review.
-
Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I.Eur J Pain. 2002;6(2):105-22. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0304. Eur J Pain. 2002. PMID: 11900471 Review.
Cited by
-
10. Complex regional pain syndrome.Pain Pract. 2025 Jan;25(1):e13413. doi: 10.1111/papr.13413. Epub 2024 Sep 11. Pain Pract. 2025. PMID: 39257325 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-term efficacy and safety of neridronate treatment in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1: a pre-specified, open-label, extension study.Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 Dec 19;14:1759720X221142274. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221142274. eCollection 2022. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022. PMID: 36569491 Free PMC article.
-
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I Following Non-Orthopedic Surgery: Case Report and Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 1;11(9):1596. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091596. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34573938 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative Pain Management for Treatment-Resistant Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Case Report.Cureus. 2024 Nov 3;16(11):e72935. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72935. eCollection 2024 Nov. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39628728 Free PMC article.
-
The Incidence of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in Simultaneous Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Dupuytren Contracture.Hand (N Y). 2018 Jul;13(4):391-394. doi: 10.1177/1558944717718345. Epub 2017 Jul 8. Hand (N Y). 2018. PMID: 28691512 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials