Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec 16;13(1):21-8.
doi: 10.1038/ni.2184.

A new synthesis for antibody-mediated immunity

Affiliations

A new synthesis for antibody-mediated immunity

Arturo Casadevall et al. Nat Immunol. .

Abstract

The view that immunoglobulins function largely by potentiating neutralization, cytotoxicity or phagocytosis is being replaced by a new synthesis whereby antibodies participate in all aspects of the immune response, from protecting the host at the earliest time of encounter with a microbe to later challenges. Perhaps the most transformative concept is that immunoglobulins manifest emergent properties, from their structure and function as individual molecules to their interactions with microbial targets and the host immune system. Given that emergent properties are neither reducible to first principles nor predictable, there is a need for new conceptual approaches for understanding antibody function and mechanisms of antibody immunity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of pro- and anti-inflammatory antibodies on three hosts that differ in their immune response to infection, as viewed in the context of the damage-response framework. (a) Positions of three infected hosts in the immune response: hosts 1 and 3 manifest disease at the two extremes of the immune response, whereas host 2 remains asymptomatic by mounting an immune response that is sufficiently strong to control infection while avoiding immune-mediated host damage. (b) The effect of a proinflammatory antibody on the three hosts in a. In this situation, the immune response of host 1 is shifted to a more optimal position and the antibody is protective, whereas for hosts 2 and 3 it has the potential to promote disease by enhancing inflammation. (c) The effect of an anti-inflammatory antibody on the three hosts in a. In this situation, host 3 benefits, whereas the same antibody can be detrimental to host 1 and ‘indifferent’ to host 2.

References

    1. Jerne NK. Towards a network theory of the immune system. Ann. Immunol. (Paris) 1974;125C:373–389. - PubMed
    1. Hébert J, Bernier D, Boutin Y, Jobin M, Mourad W. Generation of anti-idiotypic and anti-anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibodies in the same fusion. Support of Jerne’s Network Theory. J. Immunol. 1990;144:4256–4261. - PubMed
    1. Silverstein AM. History of immunology. Cellular versus humoral immunity: determinants and consequences of an epic 19th century battle. Cell. Immunol. 1979;48:208–221. - PubMed
    1. Glatman-Freedman A, Casadevall A. Serum therapy for tuberculosis revisited: a reappraisal of the role of antibody-mediated immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998;11:514–532. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casadevall A. Antibody-mediated immunity against intracellular pathogens: two-dimensional thinking comes full circle. Infect. Immun. 2003;71:4225–4228. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types