Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;87(1):78-88.
doi: 10.1002/ajh.22237.

Multiple myeloma: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

Affiliations

Multiple myeloma: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

S Vincent Rajkumar. Am J Hematol. 2012 Jan.

Erratum in

  • Am J Hematol. 2012 Apr;87(4):452
  • Am J Hematol. 2014 Jun;89(6):669

Abstract

Disease overview: Multiple myeloma accounts for ∼10% of all hematologic malignancies.

Diagnosis: The diagnosis requires 10% or more clonal plasma cells on bone marrow examination or a biopsy proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of end-organ damage felt to be related to the underlying plasma-cell disorder.

Risk stratification: Patients with 17p deletion, t(14;16), t(14;20), or high-risk gene expression profiling signature have high-risk myeloma. Patients with t(4;14) translocation, karyotypic deletion 13, or hypodiploidy are considered to have intermediate-risk disease. All others are considered to have standard-risk myeloma.

Risk-adapted therapy: Standard-risk patients are treated with nonalkylator-based therapy such as lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). An alternative strategy is to continue initial therapy after stem-cell collection, reserving ASCT for first relapse. Intermediate-risk and high-risk patients are treated with a bortezomib-based induction followed by ASCT and then bortezomib-based maintenance. Patients not eligible for ASCT can be treated with Rd for standard risk disease, or with a bortezomib-based regimen if intermediate-risk or high-risk features are present. To reduce toxicity, when using bortezomib, the once-weekly subcutaneous dose is preferred; similarly, when using dexamethasone, the low-dose approach (40 mg once a week) is preferred, unless there is a need for rapid disease control.

Management of refractory disease: Patients with indolent relapse can be treated first with two-drug or three-drug combinations. Patients with more aggressive relapse often require therapy with a combination of multiple active agents. The most promising new agents in development are pomalidomide and carfilizomib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Nothing to report

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Approach to the treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma in patients eligible for transplantation (A) and not eligible for transplantation (B). Abbreviations: ASCT, autologous stem-cell transplantation; CR, complete response; Dex, dexamethasone; Rd, lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone; VCD, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone; VGPR, very good partial response; VRD, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone. Modified from: Rajkumar SV. Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011;8:479–491.

References

    1. Rajkumar SV. Treatment of multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:479–491. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rajkumar SV, Gahrton G, Bergsagel PL. Approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma: A clash of philosophies. Blood. 2011;118:3205–3211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer Statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300. - PubMed
    1. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, Larson DR, Plevak MF, Melton LJ., III Incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County, Minnesota: Trend over 6 decades. Cancer. 2004;101:2667–2674. - PubMed
    1. Landgren O, Weiss BM. Patterns of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma in various ethnic/racial groups: Support for genetic factors in pathogenesis. Leukemia. 2009;23:1691–1697. - PubMed