Examination of noninferiority, safety, and tolerability of lopinavir/ritonavir and raltegravir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir and tenofovir/ emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naïve subjects: the progress study, 48-week results
- PMID: 22180523
- DOI: 10.1310/hct1205-255
Examination of noninferiority, safety, and tolerability of lopinavir/ritonavir and raltegravir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir and tenofovir/ emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naïve subjects: the progress study, 48-week results
Abstract
Purpose: Current antiretroviral regimens recommended for treatment-naïve patients include 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a new NRTI-sparing regimen may provide an alternative for persons for whom traditional regimens may not be the best option.
Methods: PROGRESS is a 96-week, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing the efficacy and safety of a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and an integrase inhibitor (lopi-navir/ritonavir [LPV/r] + raltegravir [RAL]) to a boosted PI and 2 NRTIs (LPV/r + tenofovir/ emtricitabine [TDF/FTC]) in antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve HIV-1-infected adults.
Results: A total of 206 subjects were randomized to receive LPV/r + RAL (n=101) or LPV/r + TDF/FTC (n=105) and analyzed for ARV efficacy using the US Food and Drug Administration time to loss of virologic response (FDA-TLOVR) algorithm. The percentage of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at week 48 was 83.2% in the LPV/r + RAL group and 84.8% in the LPV/r + TDF/FTC group (P = .850; difference -1.6%; exact 95% CI, -12.0% to 8.8%). As the lower limit of the exact 95% CI for the difference between regimens was at or above the protocol-defined threshold of -20% (as well as the more stringent threshold of -12%), LPV/r + RAL was noninferior to LPV/r + TDF/FTC. The occurrence of treatment-related, moderate/severe adverse events was similar between treatment groups through 48 weeks of treatment.
Conclusions: The HIV treatment regimen of LPV/r + RAL resulted in noninferior efficacy and comparable safety and tolerability compared with a traditional NRTI-containing regimen through 48 weeks of treatment. These results support further evaluation of the LPV/r + RAL regimen.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00711009.
Similar articles
-
Lopinavir/ritonavir combined with raltegravir or tenofovir/emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive subjects: 96-week results of the PROGRESS study.AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2013 Feb;29(2):256-65. doi: 10.1089/aid.2011.0275. Epub 2012 Aug 3. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2013. PMID: 22730929 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-matched, multicenter trial of abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine with lopinavir/ritonavir for initial HIV treatment.AIDS. 2009 Jul 31;23(12):1547-56. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832cbcc2. AIDS. 2009. PMID: 19542866 Clinical Trial.
-
Switching tenofovir/emtricitabine plus lopinavir/r to raltegravir plus Darunavir/r in patients with suppressed viral load did not result in improvement of renal function but could sustain viral suppression: a randomized multicenter trial.PLoS One. 2013 Aug 8;8(8):e73639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073639. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23951362 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone on the efficacy of first-line boosted highly active antiretroviral therapy based on protease inhibitors: meta-regression analysis of 12 clinical trials in 5168 patients.HIV Med. 2009 Oct;10(9):527-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00724.x. HIV Med. 2009. PMID: 19785663 Review.
-
48-week efficacy and safety of dolutegravir relative to commonly used third agents in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2014 Sep 4;9(9):e105653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105653. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25188312 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Use of Integrase Inhibitors in HIV-Infected Children and Adolescents.Drugs. 2015 Sep;75(13):1483-97. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0446-2. Drugs. 2015. PMID: 26242765 Review.
-
Clinical use of HIV integrase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052562. Epub 2013 Jan 9. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23341902 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Raltegravir-Based Dual Therapy in AIDS Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Front Pharmacol. 2019 Oct 17;10:1225. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01225. eCollection 2019. Front Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 31749699 Free PMC article.
-
HIV lipodystrophy in participants randomised to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) +2-3 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N(t)RTI) or LPV/r + raltegravir as second-line antiretroviral therapy.PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077138. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24204757 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
NRTI backbone in HIV treatment: will it remain relevant?Drugs. 2012 Nov 12;72(16):2051-62. doi: 10.2165/11640830-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2012. PMID: 23083109
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous