Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jun;20(3):205-12.
doi: 10.1037/a0026543. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

Delay discounting predicts adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Delay discounting predicts adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome

Catherine Stanger et al. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to identify predictors of delay discounting among adolescents receiving treatment for marijuana abuse or dependence, and to test delay discounting as a predictor of treatment outcome. Participants for this study were 165 adolescents (88% male) between the ages of 12 and 18 (mean age = 15.8 years; standard deviation = 1.3 years) who enrolled in a clinical trial comparing three behavioral treatments for adolescent marijuana abuse or dependence. Participants completed a delay discounting task at treatment onset for $100 and $1,000 of hypothetical money and marijuana. Overall, smaller magnitude rewards were discounted more than larger magnitude rewards. Delay discounting rates were concurrently related to demographic variables (socioeconomic status, race). Delay discounting of $1,000 of money predicted during treatment abstinence outcomes among adolescent marijuana abusers, over and above the effects of type of treatment received. Teens who show higher levels of discounting of the future may be an important subgroup to identify at treatment onset. Youth with a greater tendency to discount the future may require different intervention strategies that address their impulsivity (e.g., targeting executive function or inhibitory control) and/or different schedules of reinforcement to address their degree of preference for immediate rewards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean indifference points and estimated hyperbolic delay discounting curves with present value plotted as a function of delay interval. Mean indifference points are indicated by solid diamonds for the assessed delays of 1, 7, 30, and 180 days.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association; Washington, DC: 1994.
    1. Anokhin AP, Golosheykin S, Grant JD, Heath AC. Heritability of delay discounting in adolescence: a longitudinal twin study. Behavior Genetics. 2011;41(2):175–183. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9384-7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Audrain-McGovern J, Rodriguez D, Epstein LH, Cuevas J, Rodgers K, Wileyto EP. Does delay discounting play an etiological role in smoking or is it a consequence of smoking? Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2009;103(3):99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.12.019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Audrain-McGovern J, Rodriguez D, Tercyak KP, Epstein LH, Goldman P, Wileyto EP. Applying a behavioral economic framework to understanding adolescent smoking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2004;18(1):64–73. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.18.1.64. - PubMed
    1. Baker F, Johnson MW, Bickel WK. Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2003;112(3):382–392. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.3.382. - PubMed

Publication types