Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;56(3):1300-8.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.05516-11. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

Impaired fitness and transmission of macrolide-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in its natural host

Affiliations

Impaired fitness and transmission of macrolide-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in its natural host

Taradon Luangtongkum et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Campylobacter jejuni is a major zoonotic pathogen transmitted to humans via the food chain and is prevalent in chickens, a natural reservoir for this pathogenic organism. Due to the importance of macrolide antibiotics in clinical therapy of human campylobacteriosis, development of macrolide resistance in Campylobacter has become a concern for public health. To facilitate the control of macrolide-resistant Campylobacter, it is necessary to understand if macrolide resistance affects the fitness and transmission of Campylobacter in its natural host. In this study we conducted pairwise competitions and comingling experiments in chickens using clonally related and isogenic C. jejuni strains, which are either susceptible or resistant to erythromycin (Ery). In every competition pair, Ery-resistant (Ery(r)) Campylobacter was consistently outcompeted by the Ery-susceptible (Ery(s)) strain. In the comingling experiments, Ery(r) Campylobacter failed to transmit to chickens precolonized by Ery(s) Campylobacter, while isogenic Ery(s) Campylobacter was able to transmit to and establish dominance in chickens precolonized by Ery(r) Campylobacter. The fitness disadvantage was linked to the resistance-conferring mutations in the 23S rRNA. These findings clearly indicate that acquisition of macrolide resistance impairs the fitness and transmission of Campylobacter in chickens, suggesting that the prevalence of macrolide-resistant C. jejuni will likely decrease in the absence of antibiotic selection pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
In vitro growth kinetics of clonally related and isogenic C. jejuni strains. The cultures were incubated in MH broth at 42°C under microaerobic conditions with shaking (160 rpm). Each data point represents the mean log10 CFU/ml of five technical replicates. The experiment was repeated twice and similar results were obtained. 700819, Bd34-2, and Bd41-3 are Ery susceptible, while J.L. 270, J.L.272, J.L.273, and T.L.102 are Ery resistant (see Table 1 for MIC values).
Fig 2
Fig 2
Colonization levels of Erys C. jejuni ATCC 700819 (●) and clonally related Eryr strains J.L.272 (□) and J.L.273 (△) in chickens. Each Campylobacter strain was individually inoculated into chickens at the concentration of 1.4 × 106 CFU/bird (ATCC 700819), 5.56 × 105 CFU/bird (J.L.272), and 2.57 × 105 CFU/bird (J.L.273). Fecal samples were collected at 3, 6, and 10 days after inoculation. Each data point represents the number of Campylobacter obtained from an individual chicken. The mean colonization level (log10 CFU/g feces) of each group is indicated by a horizontal bar.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Pairwise competition between Erys and Eryr Campylobacter in chickens in the absence of antibiotic selection pressure. (A to E) Competition between clonally related isolates. (A) ATCC 700819 (●) versus J.L.270 (○); (B) ATCC 700819 (●) versus J.L.272 (□); (C) ATCC 700819 (●) versus J.L.273 (△); (D) Bd34-2 (■) versus J.L.272 (□); (E) Bd41-3 (▲) versus J.L.273 (△). (F to H) Competition between isogenic strains. (F) ATCC 700819 (●) versus T.L.101 (◐); (G) ATCC 700819 (●) versus T.L.102 (◧); (H) ATCC 700819 (●) versus T.L.103 (◭). Each symbol represents the number of Erys or Eryr Campylobacter in an individual chicken. The horizontal bars represent the mean colonization levels (log10 CFU/g feces) of Erys or Eryr strains detected at each sampling time point.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Levels of Campylobacter colonization in chickens before and after comingling. (A) Colonization levels of Campylobacter in chickens (n = 8) precolonized with Erys C. jejuni ATCC 700819 before and after comingling with chickens (n = 4) precolonized with Eryr transformant T.L.101. The numbers of 700819 and T.L.101 in the chickens are indicated by solid circles (●) and open triangles (△), respectively. (B) Colonization levels of Campylobacter in chickens (n = 4) precolonized with Eryr transformant T.L.101 before and after comingling with chickens (n = 8) precolonized with Erys C. jejuni ATCC 700819. The numbers of 700819 and T.L.101 in the chickens are indicated by by solid circles (●) and open triangles (△), respectively. (C) Colonization levels of Campylobacter in chickens (n = 5) precolonized with Erys C. jejuni ATCC 700819 before and after comingling with chickens (n = 11) precolonized with Eryr transformant T.L.102. The numbers of 700819 and T.L.102 in the chickens are indicated by solid circles (●) and open diamonds (♢), respectively. (D) Colonization levels of Campylobacter in chickens (n = 11) precolonized with Eryr transformant T.L.102 before and after comingling with chickens (n = 5) precolonized with Erys C. jejuni ATCC 700819. The numbers of 700819 and T.L.102 in the chickens are indicated by solid circles (●) and open diamonds (♢), respectively. (E) Colonization levels of Eryr strain T.L.101 in chickens (n = 8) in the absence of competing Erys C. jejuni. These non-mingled chickens were used as a control for the comingling study. In panels A to E, each data point represents the log10 transformed CFU number/g of feces from a single bird, and the mean colonization level (log10 CFU/g of feces) is indicated by a horizontal bar.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aarestrup FM, McDermott PF, Wegener HC. 2008. Transmission of antibiotic resistance from food animals to humans, p 645–665 In Nachamkin I, Szymanski CM, Blaser MJ. (ed), Campylobacter, 3rd ed ASM Press, Washington, DC
    1. Allos BM. 2001. Campylobacter jejuni infections: update on emerging issues and trends. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32:1201–1206 - PubMed
    1. Almofti YA, Dai M, Sun Y, Haihong H, Yuan Z. 2011. Impact of erythromycin resistance on the virulence properties and fitness of Campylobacter jejuni. Microb. Pathog. 50:336–342 - PubMed
    1. Altekruse SF, Tollefson LK. 2003. Human campylobacteriosis: a challenge for the veterinary profession. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 223:445–452 - PubMed
    1. Andersson DI. 2003. Persistence of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6:452–456 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources