Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Sep;41(6):489-93.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/57329547. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

Ex vivo comparison of Galileos cone beam CT and intraoral radiographs in detecting occlusal caries

S Rathore  1 , D Tyndall, Jt Wright, E Everett
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Ex vivo comparison of Galileos cone beam CT and intraoral radiographs in detecting occlusal caries

S Rathore et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) with intraoral radiographs for detection of occlusal caries.

Methods: A set of 60 extracted teeth were imaged using a Sirona Galileos CBCT system (Sirona Dental Systems, Bensheim, Germany) and an intraoral Planmeca® system (Planmeca OY, Helsinki, Finland). Six observers looked at both modalities and used a five-point confidence scale to evaluate presence or absence of occlusal caries. Histology was used as the gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and weighted kappa statistics were used for statistical analysis. Differences in the area under the curve (AUC) values between observers and modalities were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences in sensitivity and specificity were analysed using the Wilcoxon test. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was assessed by weighted kappa scores.

Results: The mean value and standard deviation of AUC was 0.719 ± 0.038 for CBCT and 0.649 ± 0.062 for the intraoral radiographs. The ANOVA results demonstrated that there was no significant difference between the modalities and the observers. The interobserver kappa for pairs of observers ranged from fair to substantial for bitewings (0.244-0.543) and CBCT (0.152-0.401). Four out of six observers reported higher sensitivity but lower specificity with CBCT. The Wilcoxon exact p-value showed no difference in sensitivity (0.175) or specificity (0.573) between the two modalities.

Conclusion: Based on the results we conclude that the Sirona CBCT unit cannot be used for the sole purpose of looking at occlusal caries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Close-up view of one of the test teeth using the Sirona Galileos cone beam CT system (Sirona Dental Systems, Bensheim, Germany). (b) Intraoral radiograph for one of the test teeth
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic curves for bitewing and cone beam CT. Pooled data across observers
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Souza-Zaroni WC, Ciccone JC, Souza-Gabriel AE, Ramos RP, Corona SAM, Palma-Dibb RG. Validity and reproducibility of different combinations of methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vitro comparison. Caries Res 2006;40:194–201 - PubMed
    1. Ismail A. Visual and visuo-tactile detection of dental caries. J Dent Res 2004;83:C56–66 - PubMed
    1. Wenzel A. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:3–11 - PubMed
    1. Wenzel A. Bitewing and digital bitewing radiography for detection of caries lesions. J Dent Res 2004;83:C72–75 - PubMed
    1. Tyndall DA, Clifton TL, Webber RL, Ludlow JB, Horton RA. TACT imaging of primary caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:214–225 - PubMed

Publication types