Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices
- PMID: 22184530
- PMCID: PMC3238476
- DOI: 10.4081/hr.2011.e8
Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices
Abstract
Bone marrow sampling remains essential in the evaluation of hematopoietic and many non-hematopoietic disorders. One common limitation to these procedures is the discomfort experienced by patients. To address whether a Powered biopsy system could reduce discomfort while providing equivalent or better results, we performed a randomized trial in adult volunteers. Twenty-six subjects underwent bilateral biopsies with each device. Core samples were obtained in 66.7% of Manual insertions; 100% of Powered insertions (P=0.002). Initial mean biopsy core lengths were 11.1±4.5 mm for the Manual device; 17.0±6.8 mm for the Powered device (P<0.005). Pathology assessment for the Manual device showed a mean length of 6.1±5.6 mm, width of 1.0±0.7 mm, and volume of 11.0±10.8 mm(3). Powered device measurements were mean length of 15.3±6.1 mm, width of 2.0±0.3 mm, and volume of 49.1±21.5 mm(3) (P<0.001). The mean time to core ejection was 86 seconds for Manual device; 47 seconds for the Powered device (P<0.001). The mean second look overall pain score was 33.3 for the Manual device; 20.9 for the Powered (P=0.039). We conclude that the Powered biopsy device produces superior sized specimens, with less overall pain, in less time.
Keywords: bone marrow biopsy; core biopsy; powered biopsy.; trephine biopsy.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: LJM, TEP, DFM, TAP, and KEB are employees of Vidacare Corporation, the sponsor of the study and manufacturer of one of the study devices; SCC, RS, and AJB (or their organizations) have accepted research grant funds from Vidacare Corporation, the sponsor of the study and manufacturer of one of the study devices; CS has no potential conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Using a powered bone marrow biopsy system results in shorter procedures, causes less residual pain to adult patients, and yields larger specimens.Diagn Pathol. 2011 Mar 23;6:23. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-6-23. Diagn Pathol. 2011. PMID: 21429220 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective randomised study of a rotary powered device (OnControl) for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.J Clin Pathol. 2011 Sep;64(9):809-13. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200047. Epub 2011 May 23. J Clin Pathol. 2011. PMID: 21606230 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of a powered bone marrow biopsy device with a manual system: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.J Clin Pathol. 2013 Jan;66(1):24-8. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201167. Epub 2012 Oct 26. J Clin Pathol. 2013. PMID: 23105124 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Trephine biopsy of the bone marrow.S Afr Med J. 1983 Aug 20;64(8):271-6. S Afr Med J. 1983. PMID: 6348971 Review.
-
A pathologist's perspective on bone marrow aspiration and biopsy: I. Performing a bone marrow examination.J Clin Lab Anal. 2004;18(2):70-90. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20008. J Clin Lab Anal. 2004. PMID: 15065211 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Haematoma caused by bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy.Hematol Rep. 2011 Oct 19;3(3):e25. doi: 10.4081/hr.2011.e25. Epub 2011 Nov 9. Hematol Rep. 2011. PMID: 22593816 Free PMC article.
-
Battery-powered bone drill: caution needed in densely blastic lesions.Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Dec;44(12):1845-8. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2241-2. Epub 2015 Aug 28. Skeletal Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26315889
-
Quality and cost comparison of powered versus manual bone marrow biopsy devices in patients with myelofibrosis.Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Oct;58(10):2508-2510. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1295147. Epub 2017 Feb 28. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017. PMID: 28264600 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reduction of Radiation Dose and Scanning Time While Preserving Diagnostic Yield: A Comparison of Battery-Powered and Manual Bone Biopsy Systems.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;41(3):387-392. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6428. Epub 2020 Feb 6. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020. PMID: 32029464 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of potential tissue heating during percutaneous drill-assisted bone sampling in an in vivo porcine study.Skeletal Radiol. 2022 Apr;51(4):829-836. doi: 10.1007/s00256-021-03890-w. Epub 2021 Aug 30. Skeletal Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34462782 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Snover DC. Biopsy interpretation in bone marrow transplantation. Pathol Annu. 1989;24:64–101. - PubMed
-
- Islam A, Henderson ES. Value of long-core biopsy in the detection of discrete bone marrow lesions. Histopathology. 1988;12:641–8. - PubMed
-
- Ruegg TA, Curran CR, Lamb T. Use of buffered Lidocaine in bone marrow biopsies: a RCT: theoretical framework. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009;36:52–60. - PubMed
-
- Jamshidi K, Swaim WR. Bone marrow biopsy with unaltered architecture: a new biopsy device. J Lab Clin Med. 1971;77:335–42. - PubMed
-
- Ahlstrom KH, Astrom KGO. CT-guided bone biopsy performed by means of a coaxial biopsy system with an eccentric drill. Radiology. 1993;188:549–52. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources