Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):797-804.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00001.

Defining patient complexity from the primary care physician's perspective: a cohort study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Defining patient complexity from the primary care physician's perspective: a cohort study

Richard W Grant et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Erratum in

  • Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):152. Hong, Clemens C [corrected to Hong, Clemens S]

Abstract

Background: Patients with complex health needs are increasingly the focus of health system redesign.

Objective: To characterize complex patients, as defined by their primary care physicians (PCPs), and to compare this definition with other commonly used algorithms.

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: 1 hospital-based practice, 4 community health centers, and 7 private practices in a primary care network in the United States.

Participants: 40 physicians who reviewed a random sample of 120 of their own patients.

Measurements: After excluding patients for whom they were not directly responsible, PCPs indicated which of their patients they considered complex. These patients were characterized, independent predictors of complexity were identified, and PCP-defined complexity was compared with 3 comorbidity-based methods (Charlson score, Higashi score, and a proprietary Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services algorithm).

Results: Physicians identified 1126 of their 4302 eligible patients (26.2%) as complex and assigned a mean of 2.2 domains of complexity per patient (median, 2.0 [interquartile range, 1 to 3]). Mental health and substance use were identified as major issues in younger complex patients, whereas medical decision making and care coordination predominated in older patients (P<0.001 for trends by decade). Major independent predictors of PCP-defined complexity (P<0.001) included age (probability of complexity increased from 14.8% to 19.8% with age increasing from 55 to 65 years), poorly controlled diabetes (from 12.7% to 47.6% if hemoglobin A1c level≥9%), use of antipsychotics (from 12.7% to 31.8%), alcohol-related diagnoses (from 12.9% to 27.4%), and inadequate insurance (from 12.5% to 19.2%). Classification agreement for complex patients ranged from 26.2% to 56.0% when PCP assignment was compared with each of the other methods.

Limitation: Results may not be generalizable to other primary care settings.

Conclusion: Primary care physicians identified approximately one quarter of their patients as complex. Medical, social, and behavioral factors all contributed to PCP-defined complexity. Physician-defined complexity had only modest agreement with 3 comorbidity-based algorithms.

Primary funding source: Partners Community Healthcare, Inc.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • The complexity of measuring clinical complexity.
    Turner BJ, Cuttler L. Turner BJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):851-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00009. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22184693 No abstract available.
  • Defining patient complexity.
    Olde Rikkert MG, Schers HJ, Melis RJ. Olde Rikkert MG, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 17;156(8):606; author reply 607. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-8-201204170-00013. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22508739 No abstract available.
  • Defining patient complexity.
    Cerimele JM, Peccoralo LA. Cerimele JM, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 17;156(8):606-7; author reply 607. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-8-201204170-00014. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22508740 No abstract available.

Publication types