Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;28(3-4):147-55.
doi: 10.1080/02643294.2011.633504.

The specialization of function: cognitive and neural perspectives

Affiliations

The specialization of function: cognitive and neural perspectives

Bradford Z Mahon et al. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2011 May.

Abstract

A unifying theme that cuts across all research areas and techniques in the cognitive and brain sciences is whether there is specialization of function at levels of processing that are "abstracted away" from sensory inputs and motor outputs. Any theory that articulates claims about specialization of function in the mind/brain confronts the following types of interrelated questions, each of which carries with it certain theoretical commitments. What methods are appropriate for decomposing complex cognitive and neural processes into their constituent parts? How do cognitive processes map onto neural processes, and at what resolution are they related? What types of conclusions can be drawn about the structure of mind from dissociations observed at the neural level, and vice versa? The contributions that form this Special Issue of Cognitive Neuropsychology represent recent reflections on these and other issues from leading researchers in different areas of the cognitive and brain sciences.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barrett HC, Kurzban R. Modularity in Cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review. 2006;113:628–647. - PubMed
    1. Caramazza A. Is Cognitive Neuropsychology Possible. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1992;4:80–95. - PubMed
    1. Carruthers P. The case of massively modular models of mind. In: Stainton R, editor. Contemporary debates in cognitive science. Blackwell; Oxford, England: 2005. pp. 205–225.
    1. Coltheart M. Cognition and its disorders. Science. 1989;246:827–828. - PubMed
    1. Coltheart M. Modularity and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1999;3:115–120. - PubMed

Publication types