Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec 20:4:547.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-547.

Effect of controlled and uncontrolled cooling rate on motility parameters of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa

Affiliations

Effect of controlled and uncontrolled cooling rate on motility parameters of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa

Iraj Ashrafi et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Retraction in

Abstract

Background: Ram spermatozoa are sensitive to extreme changes in temperature during the freeze-thaw process. The degree of damage depends on a combined effect of various factors including freezing temperature. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of two cooling method (controlled-rate and uncontrolled-rate) on pre-freezing and post-thaw sperm motility parameters.

Results: Ejaculates were collected using the artificial vagina from four Chal rams and three replicates of the ejaculates were diluted with a Tris-based extender and packed in 0.25 ml straws. Then, sample processed according to the two methods. Method 1: straws cooled from 37 to 5°C, at a liner rate of -0.3°C/min in a controlled-rate cooling machine (custom-built) and equilibrated at 5°C for 80 min, then the straws were frozen at rate of -0.3°C/min from 5°C to -10°C and -25°C/min from -10°C to -150°C and plunged into liquid nitrogen for storage. Method 2: straws were transferred to refrigerator and maintained at 5°C for 3 h, then the straws were frozen in liquid nitrogen vapor, 4 cm above the liquid nitrogen for 15 min and plunged into liquid nitrogen. Computer-assisted sperm motility analysis was used to analyze sperm motion characteristics.

Conclusions: Controlled rate of freezing (Method 1) significantly improve the pre-freezing and post-thaw total and progressive motility compared to uncontrolled rate (Method 2). In specific kinetic parameters, Method 1 gives significantly higher value for VSL and VCL in comparison with Method 2. There are no significant differences between the two methods for VAP and LIN. In conclusion, controlled rate of cooling conferred better cryopreserving ability to ram spermatozoa compared to uncontrolled rate of cooling prior to programmable freezing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anel L, de Paz P, Alvarez M, Chamorro CA, Boixo JC, Manso A, Gonzalez M, Kaabi M, Anel E. Field and in vitro assay of three methods for freezing ram semen. Theriogenology. 2003;60:1293–1308. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00140-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holt WV. Fundamental aspects of sperm cryobiology: the importance of species and individual differences. Theriogenology. 2000;53:47–58. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00239-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thurston LM, Siggins K, Mileham AJ, Watson PF, Holt WV. Identification of amplified restriction fragment length polymorphism markers linked to genes controlling boar sperm viability following cryopreservation. Biol Reprod. 2002;66:545–554. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod66.3.545. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anel L, Alvarez M, Martinez-Pastor F, Garcia-Macias V, Anel E, de Paz P. Improvement strategies in ovine artificial insemination. Reprod Domest Anim. 2006;41(Suppl 2):30–42. - PubMed
    1. Watson PF. Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995;7:871–891. doi: 10.1071/RD9950871. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources