Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women
- PMID: 22186768
- PMCID: PMC3422679
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182407c8a
Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women
Abstract
Background: Facilities serving vulnerable women have higher false-positive rates for diagnostic mammography than facilities serving nonvulnerable women. False positives lead to anxiety, unnecessary biopsies, and higher costs.
Objective: Examine whether availability of on-site breast ultrasound or biopsy services, academic medical center affiliation, or profit status explains differences in false-positive rates.
Design: We examined 78,733 diagnostic mammograms performed to evaluate breast problems at Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium facilities from 1999 to 2005. We used logistic-normal mixed effects regression to determine if adjusting for facility characteristics accounts for observed differences in false-positive rates.
Measures: Facilities were characterized as serving vulnerable women based on the proportion of mammograms performed on racial/ethnic minorities, women with lower educational attainment, limited household income, or rural residence.
Results: Although the availability of on-site ultrasound and biopsy services was associated with greater odds of a false positive in most models [odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.24 to 1.88; P<0.05], adjustment for these services did not attenuate the association between vulnerability and false-positive rates. Estimated ORs for the effect of vulnerability indexes on false-positive rates unadjusted for facility services were: lower educational attainment [OR 1.33; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.03-1.74]; racial/ethnic minority status (OR 1.33; 95% CI, 0.98-1.80); rural residence (OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.26-1.92); limited household income (OR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.73). After adjustment, estimates remained relatively unchanged.
Conclusions: On-site diagnostic service availability may contribute to unnecessary biopsies, but does not explain the higher diagnostic mammography false-positive rates at facilities serving vulnerable women.
Similar articles
-
Availability of Advanced Breast Imaging at Screening Facilities Serving Vulnerable Populations.J Med Screen. 2016 Mar;23(1):24-30. doi: 10.1177/0969141315591616. Epub 2015 Jun 15. J Med Screen. 2016. PMID: 26078275 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women.Med Care. 2011 Jan;49(1):67-75. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f380e0. Med Care. 2011. PMID: 20966780 Free PMC article.
-
Timeliness of abnormal screening and diagnostic mammography follow-up at facilities serving vulnerable women.Med Care. 2013 Apr;51(4):307-14. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318280f04c. Med Care. 2013. PMID: 23358386 Free PMC article.
-
An assessment of the quality of mammography care at facilities treating medically vulnerable populations.Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):701-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181789329. Med Care. 2008. PMID: 18580389 Free PMC article.
-
Supplemental Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in People With Dense Breasts: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Dec 19;23(9):1-293. eCollection 2023. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023. PMID: 39364436 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):903-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12903. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 25794085 Free PMC article.
-
Availability of Advanced Breast Imaging at Screening Facilities Serving Vulnerable Populations.J Med Screen. 2016 Mar;23(1):24-30. doi: 10.1177/0969141315591616. Epub 2015 Jun 15. J Med Screen. 2016. PMID: 26078275 Free PMC article.
-
TPM2 as a potential predictive biomarker for atherosclerosis.Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Sep 5;11(17):6960-6982. doi: 10.18632/aging.102231. Epub 2019 Sep 5. Aging (Albany NY). 2019. PMID: 31487691 Free PMC article.
-
Racial differences in false-positive mammogram rates: results from the ACRIN Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST).Med Care. 2015 Aug;53(8):673-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000393. Med Care. 2015. PMID: 26125419 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology. 2005;235:775–790. - PubMed
-
- Tan A, Freeman DH, Jr, Goodwin JS, et al. Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 - PubMed
-
- Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:502–510. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- U01 CA063740/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA69976/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA070040/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA70013/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA086082/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA63736/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA86082/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- 1 K08HS018090-01/HS/AHRQ HHS/United States
- K08 HS018090/HS/AHRQ HHS/United States
- K24 CA125036/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA70040/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA63740/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA063731/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA086076/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- KL2 RR024130/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA069976/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA86076/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA063736/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA070013/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01CA63731/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical