Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;50(3):210-6.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182407c8a.

Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women

L Elizabeth Goldman  1 , Rod Walker, Diana L Miglioretti, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, And Karla Kerlikowske; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium
Affiliations

Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women

L Elizabeth Goldman et al. Med Care. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Facilities serving vulnerable women have higher false-positive rates for diagnostic mammography than facilities serving nonvulnerable women. False positives lead to anxiety, unnecessary biopsies, and higher costs.

Objective: Examine whether availability of on-site breast ultrasound or biopsy services, academic medical center affiliation, or profit status explains differences in false-positive rates.

Design: We examined 78,733 diagnostic mammograms performed to evaluate breast problems at Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium facilities from 1999 to 2005. We used logistic-normal mixed effects regression to determine if adjusting for facility characteristics accounts for observed differences in false-positive rates.

Measures: Facilities were characterized as serving vulnerable women based on the proportion of mammograms performed on racial/ethnic minorities, women with lower educational attainment, limited household income, or rural residence.

Results: Although the availability of on-site ultrasound and biopsy services was associated with greater odds of a false positive in most models [odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.24 to 1.88; P<0.05], adjustment for these services did not attenuate the association between vulnerability and false-positive rates. Estimated ORs for the effect of vulnerability indexes on false-positive rates unadjusted for facility services were: lower educational attainment [OR 1.33; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.03-1.74]; racial/ethnic minority status (OR 1.33; 95% CI, 0.98-1.80); rural residence (OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.26-1.92); limited household income (OR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.73). After adjustment, estimates remained relatively unchanged.

Conclusions: On-site diagnostic service availability may contribute to unnecessary biopsies, but does not explain the higher diagnostic mammography false-positive rates at facilities serving vulnerable women.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology. 2005;235:775–790. - PubMed
    1. Tan A, Freeman DH, Jr, Goodwin JS, et al. Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 - PubMed
    1. Jackson SL, Taplin SH, Sickles EA, et al. Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:814–827. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:502–510. - PubMed
    1. Chubak J, Boudreau DM, Fishman PA, et al. Cost of breast-related care in the year following false positive screening mammograms. Med Care. 2010;48:815–820. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms