Accuracy of self-reported human papillomavirus vaccine receipt among adolescent girls and their mothers
- PMID: 22188843
- PMCID: PMC3245637
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.04.010
Accuracy of self-reported human papillomavirus vaccine receipt among adolescent girls and their mothers
Abstract
Purpose: The use of self-report of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination status has several implications for clinical care and research. Reports of HPV vaccination history of adolescent girls (ages: 14-17 years) and their mothers were compared with medical chart data to assess the accuracy of HPV vaccine recall.
Methods: Adolescent girls (N = 74) and their mothers independently completed questionnaires regarding HPV vaccination history, which were compared with medical chart data to assess the accuracy of HPV vaccine recall.
Results: There were high levels of inaccuracy between actual HPV vaccination and self-report of vaccine receipt. Both mothers and daughters had poor recall of HPV vaccination, and were more likely to underestimate than overestimate the coverage. Girls who accurately reported their vaccination status were not more likely to have been sexually active in the past 2 months (p = .75).
Conclusions: These findings have clinical and research implications, as self-report is relied on to assess young women's vaccination status in research settings or in the absence of medical records. These data address the still prevalent concern that HPV vaccination encourages adolescent sexual behavior. It is unlikely that sexual behaviors will change as a result of vaccination in the large percentage of girls who cannot recall being vaccinated.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
GDZ: Investigator on research projects funded by Merck & Co.’s Investigator-Initiated Studies Program
JDF: Receives compensation from American Social Health Association for continuing medical education lectures related to HPV vaccines
MLS: Speaker’s Bureau and Clinical Investigator (Merck & Co.)
References
-
- Gindi M, Oravitz P, Sexton R, Shpak M, Eisenhart A. Unreliability of reported tetanus vaccination histories. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23(2):120–122. - PubMed
-
- Skull SA, Andrews RM, Byrnes GB, et al. Validity of self-reported influenza and pneumococcal vaccination status among a cohort of hospitalized elderly inpatients. Vaccine. 2007;25(25):4775–4783. - PubMed
-
- Irving SA, Donahue JG, Shay DK, Ellis-Coyle TL, Belongia EA. Evaluation of self-reported and registry-based influenza vaccination status in a Wisconsin cohort. Vaccine. 2009;27(47):6546–6549. - PubMed
-
- Kwong JC, Manuel DG. Using OHIP physician billing claims to ascertain individual influenza vaccination status. Vaccine. 2007;25(7):1270–1274. - PubMed
-
- Hagen PT, Bond AR, Rehman H, Molella RG, Murad MH. Have you had a tetanus booster in the last 10 years? Sensitivity and specificity of the question. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(3):403–406. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous