Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;24(2):105-13.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr083. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

Adverse events in Spanish intensive care units: the SYREC study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Adverse events in Spanish intensive care units: the SYREC study

Paz Merino et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incidence and characteristics of adverse events (AEs) and no-harm events (NHEs) in critically ill patients.

Design: Observational, prospective, 24-h cross-sectional study with self-reporting.

Setting: Seventy-nine intensive care units at 76 hospitals.

Measurements: Number of events, risk of AEs and NHEs, types of incidents, severity and avoidability of incidents.

Results: A total of 1017 patients were included in the study; 591 (58%) were affected by one or more incidents. Of the 1424 valid incidents, 943 (66%) were NHEs and 481 (34%) were AEs. The individual risk of suffering at least one incident was 62%, at least one NHE 45% and at least one AE 29%. The median number of incidents, NHEs and AEs was 6, 3 and 2 per 100 patient-hours, respectively. Seventy-four per cent of the incidents were related to medication (24%), equipment (15%), nursing care (14%), accidental withdrawal of vascular accesses and catheters (10%) or airways and mechanical ventilation (10%). AEs resulted in temporary damage in 29% and in permanent damage or damage that compromised patients' lives or contributed to their death in 4%. Incidents were avoidable in 79% of cases (90% in NHEs and 60% in AEs, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The individual risk for incidents in critical patients is high. Many incidents did not harm patients, some caused damage and a few were related to the patient's death. Most incidents were considered avoidable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types