Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2012 Jan;85(1009):53-60.
doi: 10.1259/bjr/90758403.

Radiation exposure from CT in early childhood: a French large-scale multicentre study

M-O Bernier  1 , J-L Rehel, H J Brisse, X Wu-Zhou, S Caer-Lorho, S Jacob, J F Chateil, B Aubert, D Laurier
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Radiation exposure from CT in early childhood: a French large-scale multicentre study

M-O Bernier et al. Br J Radiol. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: The increasing use of CT scans in the paediatric population raises the question of a possible health impact of ionising radiation exposure associated with CT scans. The aim of this study was to describe the pattern of CT use in early childhood.

Methods: In 14 major French paediatric radiology departments, children undergoing at least 1 CT scan before age 5, between 2000 and 2006, were included. For each examination, absorbed organ doses were calculated.

Results: 43% of the 27 362 children in the cohort were aged less than 1 year during their first exposure, with 9% being aged less than 1 month. The mean number of examinations per child was 1.6 (range 1-43). The examinations included: head in 63% of the cases, chest in 21%, abdomen and pelvis in 8% and others in 8%. Brain and eye lenses received the highest cumulative doses from head examinations, with mean organ dose values of 22 mGy (maximum 1107 mGy) and 26 mGy (maximum 1392 mGy), respectively. The mean cumulative effective dose was 3.2 mSv (range 0.1-189 mSv).

Conclusion: CT scan exposure in childhood is responsible for relatively high doses to radiosensitive organs. The rather large dose range according to the protocols used requires their optimisation. The cohort follow-up will study the risk of long-term radiation-induced cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Yearly inclusion of patients and number of examinations recorded in this year over the period 2000–2006.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean cumulated organ dose by age at first exposure.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Billon S, Morin A, Caer S, Baysson H, Gambard JP, Backe JC, et al. French population exposure to radon, terrestrial gamma and cosmic rays. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;113:314–20 - PubMed
    1. Bithell JF, Stewart AM. Pre-natal irradiation and childhood malignancy: a review of British data from the Oxford Survey. Br J Cancer 1975;31:271–87 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boice JD, Jr, Morin MM, Glass AG, Friedman GD, Stovall M, Hoover RN, et al. Diagnostic X-ray procedures and risk of leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. JAMA 1991;265:1290–4 - PubMed
    1. Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE. Breast cancer mortality following diagnostic X-rays: findings from the US Scoliosis cohort study. Spine 2000;25:2052–63 - PubMed
    1. Schulze-Rath R, Hammer GP, Blettner M. Are pre- or postnatal diagnostic X-rays a risk factor for childhood cancer? A systematic review. Radiat Environ Biophys 2008;47:301–12 - PubMed

Publication types