Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:852061.
doi: 10.1155/2011/852061. Epub 2011 Nov 28.

Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review

Affiliations

Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review

Lori Weinberg et al. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011.

Abstract

The introduction of da Vinci Robotic Surgery to the field of Gynecology has resulted in large changes in surgical management. The robotic platform allows less experienced laparoscopic surgeons to perform more complex procedures. In general gynecology and reproductive gynecology, the robot is being increasingly used for procedures such as hysterectomies, myomectomies, adnexal surgery, and tubal anastomosis. Among urogynecology the robot is being utilized for sacrocolopexies. In the field of gynecologic oncology, the robot is being increasingly used for hysterectomies and lymphadenectomies in oncologic diseases. Despite the rapid and widespread adoption of robotic surgery in gynecology, there are no randomized trials comparing its efficacy and safety to other traditional surgical approaches. Our aim is to update previously published reviews with a focus on only comparative observational studies. We determined that, with the right amount of training and skill, along with appropriate patient selection, robotic surgery can be highly advantageous. Patients will likely have less blood loss, less post-operative pain, faster recoveries, and fewer complications compared to open surgery and potentially even laparoscopy. However, until larger, well-designed observational studies or randomized control trials are completed which report long-term outcomes, we cannot definitively state the superiority of robotic surgery over other surgical methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tu FF, Beaumont JL, Senapati S, Gordon TEJ. Route of hysterectomy influence and teaching hospital status. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;114(1):73–78. - PubMed
    1. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, Melek S, Hugney C. Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. The American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2005;192(5):1752–1758. - PubMed
    1. Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. The American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1996;174(2):654–658. - PubMed
    1. Marescaux J, Rubino F. The ZEUS robotic system: experimental and clinical applications. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2003;83(6):1305–1315. - PubMed
    1. Peplinski R. 2nd UK Robotic Urology Course. London, UK: Guy’s Hospital; 2006. Past, present and future of the Da Vinci robot.

LinkOut - more resources