Robotic surgery training with commercially available simulation systems in 2011: a current review and practice pattern survey from the society of urologic robotic surgeons
- PMID: 22192114
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0371
Robotic surgery training with commercially available simulation systems in 2011: a current review and practice pattern survey from the society of urologic robotic surgeons
Abstract
Objectives: Virtual reality (VR) simulation has the potential to standardize surgical training for robotic surgery. We sought to evaluate all commercially available VR robotic simulators.
Materials and methods: A MEDLINE(®) literature search was performed of all applicable keywords. Available VR simulators were evaluated with regard to face, content, and construct validation. Additionally, a survey was e-mailed to all members of the Endourological Society, querying the pervasiveness of VR simulators in robotic surgical training. Finally, each company was e-mailed to ask for a price quote for their respective system.
Results: There are four VR robotic surgical simulators currently available: RoSS™, dV-Trainer™, SEP Robot™, and da Vinci(®) Skills Simulator™. Each system is represented in the literature and all possess varying degrees of face, content, and construct validity. Although all systems have basic skill sets with performance analysis and metrics software, most do not contain procedural components. When evaluating the results of our survey, most respondents did not possess a VR simulator although almost all believed there to be great potential for these devices in robotic surgical training. With the exception of the SEP Robot, all VR simulators are similar in price.
Conclusions: VR simulators have a definite role in the future of robotic surgical training. Although the simulators target technical components of training, their largest impact will be appreciated when incorporated into a comprehensive educational curriculum.
Similar articles
-
Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2169-78. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4517-y. Epub 2015 Aug 25. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26304107 Review.
-
Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education.J Endourol. 2012 Dec;26(12):1629-34. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0328. Epub 2012 Oct 2. J Endourol. 2012. PMID: 22845173
-
Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5):836-42. doi: 10.1111/bju.12559. Epub 2014 Mar 20. BJU Int. 2014. PMID: 24224500
-
Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator.J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):1019-24. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.064. Epub 2011 Jul 23. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21784469
-
Current status of robotic simulators in acquisition of robotic surgical skills.Curr Opin Urol. 2015 Mar;25(2):168-74. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000137. Curr Opin Urol. 2015. PMID: 25574791 Review.
Cited by
-
Bringing excellence into urology: How to improve the future training of residents?Arab J Urol. 2014 Mar;12(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Arab J Urol. 2014. PMID: 26019915 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art.World J Surg. 2013 Dec;37(12):2812-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2065-y. World J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23640724 Review.
-
Training residents in robotic thoracic surgery.J Thorac Dis. 2021 Oct;13(10):6169-6178. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2019-rts-06. J Thorac Dis. 2021. PMID: 34795968 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Learning curve assessment of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open-surgery controls from the premier perspective database.J Endourol. 2014 May;28(5):560-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0534. Epub 2014 Feb 6. J Endourol. 2014. PMID: 24350787 Free PMC article.
-
Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2169-78. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4517-y. Epub 2015 Aug 25. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26304107 Review.