Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Feb;97(2):355-60.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.044. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus medical management of early pregnancy loss

Mary Rausch  1 , Scott Lorch, Karine Chung, Margaret Frederick, Jun Zhang, Kurt Barnhart
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus medical management of early pregnancy loss

Mary Rausch et al. Fertil Steril. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of medical and surgical management of early pregnancy loss.

Design: Analyses of cost, effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and utilities of a multicenter trial with 652 women with first-trimester pregnancy failure randomized to medical or surgical management.

Setting: Analysis of data from a multicenter trial.

Patient(s): Secondary analysis of a multicenter trial.

Intervention(s): Cost-effectiveness analysis.

Main outcome measure(s): Cost and effectiveness of competing treatment strategies.

Result(s): Cost analysis of treatment demonstrates an increased cost of US$336 for 13% increased efficacy of surgical management. This analysis was sensitive to the probability of an extra office visit, the cost of the visit, and the probability of success. When the surgical arm is divided into outpatient manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) versus inpatient electric vacuum aspiration (EVA), there is an increased cost of $745 for EVA but a decreased cost of $202 for MVA compared with medical management. In general, MVA was found to be more cost-effective than medical management. For treatment of incomplete or inevitable abortion, medical management was found to be less costly and more efficacious. Utilities studies demonstrated that a patient would need to prefer surgery 14% less than medication for its treatment efficacy to be outweighed by the desire to avoid surgery.

Conclusion(s): Surgical or medical management of early pregnancy failure can be cost effective, depending on the circumstances. Surgery is cost effective and more efficacious when performed in an outpatient setting. For incomplete or inevitable abortion, medical management is cost effective and more efficacious.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Graph 1
Graph 1
One-way sensitivity analysis
Graph 2
Graph 2
Two-way sensitivity analysis
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’Connor JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP, Canfield RE, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(4):189–94. - PubMed
    1. Warburton D, Fraser FC. Spontaneous Abortion Risks in Man: Data from Reproductive Histories Collected in a Medical Genetics Unit. Am J Hum Genet. 1964;16:1–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen BA, Creinin MD. Medical management of early pregnancy failure: efficacy. Semin Reprod Med. 2008;26(5):411–22. - PubMed
    1. Zhang J, Gilles JM, Barnhart K, Creinin MD, Westhoff C, Frederick MM. A comparison of medical management with misoprostol and surgical management for early pregnancy failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(8):761–9. - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal PD, Remsburg RE. A time and cost analysis of the management of incomplete abortion with manual vacuum aspiration. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994;45(3):261–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances