Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2011 Dec;168(12):1266-77.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704.

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults

Kelly Posner  1 , Gregory K Brown, Barbara Stanley, David A Brent, Kseniya V Yershova, Maria A Oquendo, Glenn W Currier, Glenn A Melvin, Laurence Greenhill, Sa Shen, J John Mann
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults

Kelly Posner et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Research on suicide prevention and interventions requires a standard method for assessing both suicidal ideation and behavior to identify those at risk and to track treatment response. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was designed to quantify the severity of suicidal ideation and behavior. The authors examined the psychometric properties of the scale.

Method: The C-SSRS's validity relative to other measures of suicidal ideation and behavior and the internal consistency of its intensity of ideation subscale were analyzed in three multisite studies: a treatment study of adolescent suicide attempters (N=124); a medication efficacy trial with depressed adolescents (N=312); and a study of adults presenting to an emergency department for psychiatric reasons (N=237).

Results: The C-SSRS demonstrated good convergent and divergent validity with other multi-informant suicidal ideation and behavior scales and had high sensitivity and specificity for suicidal behavior classifications compared with another behavior scale and an independent suicide evaluation board. Both the ideation and behavior subscales were sensitive to change over time. The intensity of ideation subscale demonstrated moderate to strong internal consistency. In the adolescent suicide attempters study, worst-point lifetime suicidal ideation on the C-SSRS predicted suicide attempts during the study, whereas the Scale for Suicide Ideation did not. Participants with the two highest levels of ideation severity (intent or intent with plan) at baseline had higher odds for attempting suicide during the study.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the C-SSRS is suitable for assessment of suicidal ideation and behavior in clinical and research settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. Baseline Rates of Suicidal Ideation and Lifetime Actual Attempts in Three Studiesa
a Study 1 was a treatment study of adolescent suicide attempters (N=124); study 2 was a medication efficacy trial in depressed adolescents (N=312); study 3 was a study of adults presenting to an emergency department for psychiatric reasons (N=237). In study 1, ideation data for “last week” were missing for 17 (13%) subjects. In study 2, ideation data at baseline were missing for 97 (31%) subjects. b In study 1, among patients with lifetime actual attempts, 46.8% had multiple actual attempts.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Number of Cases in Study 1 Identified on the Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Behavior Subscale and the Columbia Suicide History Form, by Type of Behaviora
a Total N included all those assessed with both the C-SSRS (past week and since last assessment combined) and the Columbia Suicide History Form. kappa=0.66, 95% CI=0.23–1.00.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mean Values in Study 1 for the Severity and Intensity of Ideation Subscales of the Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and the Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI) Total Score, by Treatment Week
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Proportion of Cases in Study 1 Identified on Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale Behavior Item and by the Suicide Evaluation Board
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. National Strategy for Suicide Prevention: Goals and Objectives for Action. Rockville, Md: Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Crosby AE, Ortega L, Melanson C. Self-Directed Violence Surveillance: Uniform Definitions and Recommended Data Elements, Version 1.0. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Feb, 2011.
    1. Goldsmith SK, Pellmar TC, Kleinman AM, Bunney WE, editors. Reducing Suicide: A National Imperative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002. - PubMed
    1. Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, Posternak MA. Exclusion criteria used in antidepressant efficacy trials: consistency across studies and representativeness of samples included. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004;192:87–94. - PubMed
    1. Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, Posternak MA. Generalizability of antidepressant efficacy trials: differences between depressed psychiatric outpatients who would or would not qualify for an efficacy trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1370–1372. - PubMed

Publication types