Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:1489-98.
Epub 2011 Oct 22.

A real-time screening alert improves patient recruitment efficiency

Affiliations

A real-time screening alert improves patient recruitment efficiency

Chunhua Weng et al. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011.

Abstract

The scarcity of cost-effective patient identification methods represents a significant barrier to clinical research. Research recruitment alerts have been designed to facilitate physician referrals but limited support is available to clinical researchers. We conducted a retrospective data analysis to evaluate the efficacy of a real-time patient identification alert delivered to clinical research coordinators recruiting for a clinical prospective cohort study. Data from log analysis and informal interviews with coordinators were triangulated. Over a 12-month period, 11,295 were screened electronically, 1,449 were interviewed, and 282 were enrolled. The enrollment rates for the alert and two other conventional methods were 4.65%, 2.01%, and 1.34% respectively. A taxonomy of eligibility status was proposed to precisely categorize research patients. Practical ineligibility factors were identified and their correlation with age and gender were analyzed. We conclude that the automatic prescreening alert improves screening efficiency and is an effective aid to clinical research coordinators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The patient screening and recruitment workflow.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The patient status transition diagram.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Monthly enrollment using the 3 methods.

References

    1. Sullivan J. Subject Recruitment and Retention: Barriers to Success. Applied Clinical Trials. 2004 Apr; 2004.
    1. Sinackevich N, Tassignon J-P. Speeding the Critical Path. Applied Clinical Trials. 2004 Jan; 2004.
    1. Rubin R, Rujimoto W, Marrero D, Brenneman T, Charleston J, Edelstein S. The Diabetes Prevention Program: recruitment methods and results. Controlled Clinical Trials. 2002;23:157–171. - PubMed
    1. Carlson R, Tu S, Lane N, et al. Computer-based screening of patients with HIV/AIDS for clinical-trial eligibility. Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1995 - PubMed
    1. Fink E, Kokku PK, Nikiforou S, Hall LO, Goldgof DB, Krischer JP. Selection of patients for clinical trials: an interactive web-based system. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2004;31(3):241–254. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources