Contact points during multidigit grasping of geometric objects
- PMID: 22198529
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2980-9
Contact points during multidigit grasping of geometric objects
Abstract
We investigated the choice of contact points during multidigit grasping of different objects. In Experiment 1, cylinders were grasped and lifted. Participants were either instructed as to the number of fingers they should use, ranging from a two-finger grasp to a five-finger grasp, or could grasp with their preferred number of fingers. We found a strong relationship between the position of the fingertips on the object and the number of fingers used. In general, variability in the choice of contact points was low within- as well as between participants. The virtual finger, defined as the geometric mean position of fingers opposing the thumb, was in almost perfect opposition to the thumb, suggesting the formation of a functional unit using all contributing fingers in the grasp. In Experiment 2, four more complex shapes (rectangle, hexagon, pentagon, curved object) were grasped. Although we found some moderate between-participant variability in the choice of contact points, the within-participant variability was again remarkably low. In both experiments, participants showed a strong preference to use four or five fingers during grasping when left with free choice. Taken together, our findings suggest a preplanning of the grasping movement and that grasping results from a coordinated interplay between the fingers contributing to the grasp that cannot be understood as independent digit movements.
Similar articles
-
Precision grasps of children and young and old adults: individual differences in digit contact strategy, purchase pattern, and digit posture.Behav Brain Res. 2004 Sep 23;154(1):113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.01.028. Behav Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15302117 Clinical Trial.
-
Independent movements of the digits in grasping.Exp Brain Res. 2001 Jul;139(1):92-100. doi: 10.1007/s002210100748. Exp Brain Res. 2001. PMID: 11482847
-
The influence of obstacles on grasp planning.Exp Brain Res. 2018 Oct;236(10):2639-2648. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5321-4. Epub 2018 Jul 4. Exp Brain Res. 2018. PMID: 29974146
-
A review of grasping as the movements of digits in space.J Neurophysiol. 2019 Oct 1;122(4):1578-1597. doi: 10.1152/jn.00123.2019. Epub 2019 Jul 24. J Neurophysiol. 2019. PMID: 31339802 Review.
-
Grasping Occam's razor.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;629:499-522. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_27. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009. PMID: 19227518 Review.
Cited by
-
Learned manipulation at unconstrained contacts does not transfer across hands.PLoS One. 2014 Sep 18;9(9):e108222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108222. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25233091 Free PMC article.
-
Hands Holding Clues for Object Recognition in Teachable Machines.Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2019 May;2019:336. doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300566. Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2019. PMID: 32043091 Free PMC article.
-
Hand pose selection in a bimanual fine-manipulation task.J Neurophysiol. 2021 Jul 1;126(1):195-212. doi: 10.1152/jn.00635.2020. Epub 2021 Jun 9. J Neurophysiol. 2021. PMID: 34107225 Free PMC article.
-
Haptic-motor transformations for the control of finger position.PLoS One. 2013 Jun 6;8(6):e66140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066140. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23762477 Free PMC article.
-
Eye and hand movements disrupt attentional control.PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0262567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262567. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35045115 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources