Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;22(2):154-64.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050149. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

Local Nordic tobacco interests collaborated with multinational companies to maintain a united front and undermine tobacco control policies

Affiliations

Local Nordic tobacco interests collaborated with multinational companies to maintain a united front and undermine tobacco control policies

Heikki Hiilamo et al. Tob Control. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To analyse how local tobacco companies in the Nordic countries, individually and through National Manufacturers' Associations, cooperated with British American Tobacco and Philip Morris in denying the health hazards of smoking and undermining tobacco control.

Methods: Analysis of tobacco control policies in the Nordic countries and tobacco industry documents.

Results: Nordic countries were early adopters of tobacco control policies. The multinational tobacco companies recognised this fact and mobilised to oppose these policies, in part because of fear that they would set unfavourable precedents. Since at least 1972, the Nordic tobacco companies were well informed about and willing to participate in the multinational companies activities to obscure the health dangers of smoking and secondhand smoke and to oppose tobacco control policies. Cooperation between multinational companies, Nordic national manufacturer associations and local companies ensured a united front on smoking and health issues in the Nordic area that was consistent with the positions that the multinational companies were taking. This cooperation delayed smoke-free laws and undermined other tobacco control measures.

Conclusions: Local tobacco companies worked with multinational companies to undermine tobacco control in distant and small Nordic markets because of concern that pioneering policies initiated in Nordic countries would spread to bigger market areas. Claims by the local Nordic companies that they were not actively involved with the multinationals are not supported by the facts. These results also demonstrate that the industry appreciates the global importance of both positive and negative public health precedents in tobacco control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests HH served as an expert witness for a plaintiff in tobacco litigation discussed in this paper, Salminen v. Amer Sports Oyj and BAT Finland in 2008 and in 2009. SAG has nothing to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Leppo K, Vertio H. Smoking control in Finland: a case study in policy formulation and implementation. Health Promot Int. 1986;1:5–16.
    1. Hakala K, Waller M, editors. Towards Smokefree Societies. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; 2003. Nordic Tobacco Control.
    1. Egsmose T. The tobacco problem in Denmark and the difficulties in implementing an organized plan of action. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1985;10:457–63. - PubMed
    1. Bjartveit K. An Outline of Period 1964–1993. Oslo: Sosial - og helsedirektoratet (Directorate for Health and Social Affairs); 2003. Tobacco Control in Norway. Government Initiatives.
    1. Thoma W. Remarks by Walter Thoma PMI Corporate Affairs Conference Boca Raton, Florida Wednesday; Philip Morris; Nov 30, 1988. [accessed 1 Oct 2010]. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/caj22e00.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances