Local Nordic tobacco interests collaborated with multinational companies to maintain a united front and undermine tobacco control policies
- PMID: 22199013
- PMCID: PMC3346886
- DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050149
Local Nordic tobacco interests collaborated with multinational companies to maintain a united front and undermine tobacco control policies
Abstract
Objective: To analyse how local tobacco companies in the Nordic countries, individually and through National Manufacturers' Associations, cooperated with British American Tobacco and Philip Morris in denying the health hazards of smoking and undermining tobacco control.
Methods: Analysis of tobacco control policies in the Nordic countries and tobacco industry documents.
Results: Nordic countries were early adopters of tobacco control policies. The multinational tobacco companies recognised this fact and mobilised to oppose these policies, in part because of fear that they would set unfavourable precedents. Since at least 1972, the Nordic tobacco companies were well informed about and willing to participate in the multinational companies activities to obscure the health dangers of smoking and secondhand smoke and to oppose tobacco control policies. Cooperation between multinational companies, Nordic national manufacturer associations and local companies ensured a united front on smoking and health issues in the Nordic area that was consistent with the positions that the multinational companies were taking. This cooperation delayed smoke-free laws and undermined other tobacco control measures.
Conclusions: Local tobacco companies worked with multinational companies to undermine tobacco control in distant and small Nordic markets because of concern that pioneering policies initiated in Nordic countries would spread to bigger market areas. Claims by the local Nordic companies that they were not actively involved with the multinationals are not supported by the facts. These results also demonstrate that the industry appreciates the global importance of both positive and negative public health precedents in tobacco control.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Tobacco-control policies in tobacco-growing states: where tobacco was king.Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):319-58. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12124. Milbank Q. 2015. PMID: 26044632 Free PMC article.
-
"Accommodating" smoke-free policies: tobacco industry's Courtesy of Choice programme in Latin America.Tob Control. 2007 Oct;16(5):e6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.018275. Tob Control. 2007. PMID: 17897975 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Attempts to undermine tobacco control: tobacco industry "youth smoking prevention" programs to undermine meaningful tobacco control in Latin America.Am J Public Health. 2007 Aug;97(8):1357-67. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.094128. Epub 2007 Jun 28. Am J Public Health. 2007. PMID: 17600260 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco companies flout anti-tobacco laws in India.Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e513. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30569-7. Epub 2017 Jul 27. Lancet Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28757376 No abstract available.
-
ARTIST (Asian regional tobacco industry scientist team): Philip Morris' attempt to exert a scientific and regulatory agenda on Asia.Tob Control. 2004 Dec;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii118-24. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.009001. Tob Control. 2004. PMID: 15564214 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Trends in smoking initiation in Europe over 40 years: A retrospective cohort study.PLoS One. 2018 Aug 22;13(8):e0201881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201881. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30133533 Free PMC article.
-
Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay: transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International.Tob Control. 2018 Mar;27(2):185-194. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053690. Epub 2017 Mar 23. Tob Control. 2018. PMID: 28336521 Free PMC article.
-
The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries.Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):117-29. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-9914-0. Epub 2012 Feb 28. Cancer Causes Control. 2012. PMID: 22370696 Free PMC article.
-
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Slovakia and in Finland: one law, two different practices?BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12914-020-00243-x. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020. PMID: 32993626 Free PMC article.
-
The tobacco industry's challenges to standardised packaging: A comparative analysis of issue framing in public relations campaigns in four countries.Health Policy. 2018 Sep;122(9):1001-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 15. Health Policy. 2018. PMID: 30139670 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Leppo K, Vertio H. Smoking control in Finland: a case study in policy formulation and implementation. Health Promot Int. 1986;1:5–16.
-
- Hakala K, Waller M, editors. Towards Smokefree Societies. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; 2003. Nordic Tobacco Control.
-
- Egsmose T. The tobacco problem in Denmark and the difficulties in implementing an organized plan of action. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1985;10:457–63. - PubMed
-
- Bjartveit K. An Outline of Period 1964–1993. Oslo: Sosial - og helsedirektoratet (Directorate for Health and Social Affairs); 2003. Tobacco Control in Norway. Government Initiatives.
-
- Thoma W. Remarks by Walter Thoma PMI Corporate Affairs Conference Boca Raton, Florida Wednesday; Philip Morris; Nov 30, 1988. [accessed 1 Oct 2010]. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/caj22e00.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical