Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;21(9):1551-64.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0067-5. Epub 2011 Dec 27.

A five-year prospective study of quality of life after colorectal cancer

Affiliations

A five-year prospective study of quality of life after colorectal cancer

Suzanne K Chambers et al. Qual Life Res. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Long-term (≥5 years) quality of life after colorectal cancer is not well described. The present study assessed quality of life (QOL) and psychological distress in colorectal cancer survivors more than 5 years to describe changes over time and antecedents of long-term outcomes.

Method: A prospective survey of a population-based sample of 763 colorectal cancer patients assessed socio-demographic variables, health behaviors, optimism, threat appraisal, and perceived social support at 5 months post-diagnosis as predictors of QOL and psychological distress 5 years post-diagnosis.

Results: QOL improved over time (P < 0.01 for each measure); however, measures of psychological distress remained stable (P > 0.07 for each measure). Risk factors for poorer QOL and/or greater psychological distress included: later stage disease, having a permanent stoma, rectal cancer, fatigue, smoking, being single, low social support, low optimism, and a more negative cancer threat appraisal. Being women, having a pet, having a private health insurance, and receiving both surgery and adjuvant treatment were protective.

Conclusion: Consistent with response shift theory, the antecedents of QOL after colorectal cancer are multifactorial and include predisposing socio-demographic, medical, and psychological variables. Psychosocial interventions that target both social support and threat appraisal may be effective for this patient group. Additional stepped-up support may be needed for people from a poorer social environment who have multiple risk factors for poorer adjustment. Health system effects require further investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996 Jun;67(2):221-7 - PubMed
    1. Med J Aust. 2011 Sep 19;195(6):350-4 - PubMed
    1. Psychooncology. 2009 Feb;18(2):216-20 - PubMed
    1. Qual Life Res. 1999 May;8(3):181-95 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 1;24(22):3527-34 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources