Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 5;367(1587):430-8.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0246.

Coalescent patterns for chromosomal inversions in divergent populations

Affiliations

Coalescent patterns for chromosomal inversions in divergent populations

Rafael F Guerrero et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Chromosomal inversions allow genetic divergence of locally adapted populations by reducing recombination between chromosomes with different arrangements. Divergence between populations (or hybridization between species) is expected to leave signatures in the neutral genetic diversity of the inverted region. Quantitative expectations for these patterns, however, have not been obtained. Here, we develop coalescent models of neutral sites linked to an inversion polymorphism in two locally adapted populations. We consider two scenarios of local adaptation: selection on the inversion breakpoints and selection on alleles inside the inversion. We find that ancient inversion polymorphisms cause genetic diversity to depart dramatically from neutral expectations. Other situations, however, lead to patterns that may be difficult to detect; important determinants are the age of the inversion and the rate of gene flux between arrangements. We also study inversions under genetic drift, finding that they produce patterns similar to locally adapted inversions of intermediate age. Our results are consistent with empirical observations, and provide the foundation for quantitative analyses of the roles that inversions have played in speciation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Expected coalescent times for neutral sites linked to an old inversion with locally adapted breakpoints (left) or alleles (right). Two genes are sampled from the same arrangement (formula image, formula image, filled circles), or between arrangements (formula image, open circles), for the cases where q = 0.09 (black lines) or q = 0.02 (grey line). The breakpoints are located at 0 and 10 cM, and an arrow indicates the position of one locally adapted allele. Curves are based on analytical results, and the circles show simulation results (106 runs each). Squares show evaluations from the generating function method (see text). The horizontal dashed line shows the expectation for a neutral subdivided population. In both models, the patterns for the opposite half of the inversion (not shown) are symmetric to the ones presented. Shown on both sides, patterns for a small portion of the flanking region with normal recombination patterns.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The effect of migration (Nm) on FST and FAT under the model of locally adapted breakpoints. Results are shown for three values of gene flux: ϕ = 10−3 (dotted line), ϕ = 10−5 (dashed lines) and ϕ = 10−8 (solid lines).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Expected coalescent time for pairs of genes linked to a young inversion under three alternative models. Two genes are sampled from the same arrangement (formula image, formula image, filled circles), or different arrangements (formula image, open circles). (a) A neutral inversion in a single population, at frequency x0 = 0.5. (b) An inversion with locally adapted breakpoints. (c) An inversion that carries two locally adapted alleles. In (b) and (c), T* = 0.1 and q = 0.09. The breakpoints are at 0 and 10 cM, and an arrow indicates the position of one locally adapted allele. The points show simulation results (106 runs each), and lines are added for clarity purposes only. The dashed line shows the SNM for (a), and a neutral subdivided population for (b) and (c). Only the left half of the inversion is shown for each case; patterns for the right half of the inversion are symmetric to the ones presented.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effect of the age inversion, T* (in N generations), on the expected coalescent time of pairs of genes under the locally adapted breakpoints model (at ϕ = 10−5, N = 105). The points show simulation results (105 runs each), and lines are added for clarity purposes only. Two cases are presented q = 0.09 (black lines), and q = 0.02 (grey lines).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hoffmann A., Rieseberg L. 2008. Revisiting the impact of inversions in evolution: from population genetic markers to drivers of adaptive shifts and speciation? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 21.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173532 (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173532) - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirkpatrick M. 2010. How and why chromosome inversions evolve. PLoS Biol. 8, 1000501.10.1371/journal.pbio.1000501 (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000501) - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dobzhansky T. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species (eds Eldredge N., Gould S. J.), 3rd edn. New York, NY: Columbia University Press
    1. White M. J. D. 1973. Animal cytology and evolution, 3rd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
    1. Sandler L., Hiraizumi Y. 1960. Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Instability at the segregation-distorter locus. Genetics 45, 1269–1287 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources