Commentary: a sense of story, or why teach reflective writing?
- PMID: 22201631
- PMCID: PMC3247912
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823a59c7
Commentary: a sense of story, or why teach reflective writing?
Abstract
Reflective writing is being introduced in many medical schools in the United States and abroad for a variety of reasons and with a variety of goals in mind. As Wald and colleagues write, multiple methods, including the rubric introduced in their study, have been proposed for rating or grading this writing to quantify the gains obtained. The authors of this commentary detail the assumptions both about reflection and about writing implied in Wald and colleagues' work. They then describe a reciprocal model of writing as discovery, suggesting that the writing itself is what teaches the skills of reflection. Equipping medical students with a sense of story may well be the active ingredient in whatever gains are observed in teaching reflective writing.
Comment on
-
Fostering and evaluating reflective capacity in medical education: developing the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective writing.Acad Med. 2012 Jan;87(1):41-50. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823b55fa. Acad Med. 2012. PMID: 22104060
References
-
- Brockmeier J, Carbaugh D, editors. Narrative and Identity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2001. p. 40.
-
- Wald HS, Borkan JM, Taylor JS, Anthony D, Reis SP. Fostering and evaluating reflective capacity in medical education: Developing the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective writing. Acad Med. 2012;87:XX–XX. - PubMed
-
- James H. The Art of the Novel. Boston: Northwestern University Press; 1984. p. 347. Second citation.
-
- Mudoch I. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge; 1970.
-
- Levinas E. In: Totality and Infinity. Lingis Alphonso., translator. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press; 1969.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
