Physician, patient, and contextual factors affecting treatment decisions in older adults with cancer and models of decision making: a literature review
- PMID: 22201670
- PMCID: PMC3247918
- DOI: 10.1188/12.ONF.E70-E83
Physician, patient, and contextual factors affecting treatment decisions in older adults with cancer and models of decision making: a literature review
Abstract
Purpose/objectives: To review physician, patient, and contextual factors that affect treatment decision making in older adults diagnosed with cancer, and to relate those factors to theoretical models of decision making.
Data sources: PubMed (1966 to April 2010), PsycINFO (1967 to April 2010) and CINAHL® (1982 to April 2010) databases were searched to access relevant medical, psychological, and nursing literature.
Data synthesis: Physician factors in treatment decisions included physician's personal beliefs and values, medical expertise, practice type, perception of lowered life expectancy, medical factors, power, and communication style. Patient factors included personal beliefs and values, ethnicity, decisional control preferences, previous health-related experience, perception of the decision-making process, and personal factors. Contextual factors included availability of caregiver, insurance, financial status, and geographical barrier.
Conclusions: A diverse group of factors were identified, which are likely to form a unique framework to understand clinical decision making and plan future investigations in older adult patient populations. Using longitudinal and prospective designs to examine the real-time interplay of patient, physician, and contextual factors will enable a better understanding of how those divergent factors influence actual treatment decisions.
Implications for nursing: Oncology nurses can advocate autonomous (patient-driven), shared, or family-controlled treatment decisions, depending on an older patient's decisional role preference. Nurses can support patient autonomy during treatment decision making by coaching patients to engage in discussion of various evidence-based treatment options and a comprehensive discussion of the probability of success for each option with specialist providers. Oncology nurses may be able to promote treatment decisions that are consistent with a patient's personal preferences and values, with strong consideration of the patient's personal contexts.
Similar articles
-
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 27820528
-
Older adults newly diagnosed with symptomatic myeloma and treatment decision making.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Jul 1;41(4):411-9. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.411-419. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014. PMID: 24969250 Free PMC article.
-
Medical expertise and patient involvement: a multiperspective qualitative observation study of the patient's role in oncological decision making.Oncologist. 2014 Jun;19(6):654-60. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0268. Epub 2014 Apr 23. Oncologist. 2014. PMID: 24760711 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision making among individuals with cancer in non-Western cultures: a literature review.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Sep;40(5):454-63. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.454-463. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013. PMID: 23989019 Review.
-
Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. PMID: 27606392 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Opportunities to use electronic health record audit logs to improve cancer care.Cancer Med. 2022 Sep;11(17):3296-3303. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4690. Epub 2022 Mar 29. Cancer Med. 2022. PMID: 35348298 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) treatment and associated costs in the public sector compared to the private sector in Johannesburg, South Africa.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 7;20(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05112-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32264964 Free PMC article.
-
Decision Aid Implementation and Patients' Preferences for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: Insights from the High Value Healthcare Collaborative.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Jan 6;14:23-32. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S227207. eCollection 2020. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020. PMID: 32021114 Free PMC article.
-
Was a decision made? An assessment of patient-clinician discordance in medical oncology encounters.Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3374-81. doi: 10.1111/hex.12340. Epub 2015 Jan 26. Health Expect. 2015. PMID: 25619877 Free PMC article.
-
Utilisation of endocrine therapy for cancer in Indigenous peoples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12627-6. BMC Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39039483 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Amalraj S, Starkweather C, Nguyen C, Naeim A. Health literacy, communication, and treatment decision-making in older cancer patients. Oncology (Williston Park) 2009;23(4):369–375. - PubMed
-
- Back MF, Huak CY. Family centered decision making and non-disclosure of diagnosis in a South Asian oncology practice. Psychooncology. 2005;14:1052–1059. - PubMed
-
- Bailey C, Corner J, Addington-Hall J, Kumar D, Nelson M, Haviland J. Treatment decisions in older patients with colorectal cancer: the role of age and multidimensional function. European Journal of Cancer Care (Engl) 2003;12(3):257–262. - PubMed
-
- Balducci L. Management of cancer in the elderly. Oncology (Williston Park) 2006;20(2):135–143. discussion 144, 146, 151–132. - PubMed
-
- Balneaves LG, Long B. An embedded decisional model of stress and coping: implications for exploring treatment decision making by women with breast cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999;30(4):882–892. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous