Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jan;93(1 Suppl):S70-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.206.

Rehabilitation targeted at everyday communication: can we change the talk of people with aphasia and their significant others within conversation?

Affiliations
Review

Rehabilitation targeted at everyday communication: can we change the talk of people with aphasia and their significant others within conversation?

Ray Wilkinson et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether aphasia therapy can change the talk of speakers with aphasia and/or their significant others within conversation.

Design: Small number of intervention studies targeting conversations involving speakers with aphasia are reviewed. All are single case studies.

Setting: Key assessment in the studies was an audio or video recording of 1 or more conversations between the dyad, usually made in the home setting. Intervention in these studies took place in the participants' home or another setting, such as a therapy room.

Participants: In all of the studies reviewed, the participants consisted of a person with aphasia (PWA) and a significant other, usually the PWA's spouse.

Interventions: In all studies, therapy took the form of a behavioral intervention involving the provision of feedback to the significant other and/or PWA on their conversational behaviors uncovered by a conversation analysis assessment. Handouts, transcripts, discussion, and video feedback were used. Suggestions to permit participants to cope better with the effects of aphasia within conversation were given, and opportunities for practicing these strategies within conversation were provided.

Main outcome measures: Postintervention, 1 or more conversations involving the PWA and significant other were recorded in the same manner as the preintervention. Conversations were analyzed in relation to changes in the behaviors targeted in intervention, such as those involved in topic initiation or repair of linguistic errors.

Results: Each of the studies reviewed presented evidence that the talk of people with aphasia and/or their significant others can be changed in conversation. In some studies the evidence is primarily qualitative, in the form of observed changes to conversational behaviors postintervention. Some studies produce stronger evidence by combining qualitative and quantitative analyses of change.

Conclusions: There is evidence that intervention targeting conversations involving an aphasic speaker can achieve change. Future studies should move beyond single case designs, include more robust, quantifiable evidence of change, and provide evidence of maintenance of change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources