Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study
- PMID: 22202669
- PMCID: PMC3271968
- DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-82
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study
Abstract
Background: Before trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), assessment of cardiac function and accurate measurement of the aortic root are key to determine the correct size and type of the prosthesis. The aim of this study was to compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) for the assessment of aortic valve measurements and left ventricular function in high-risk elderly patients submitted to TAVI.
Methods: Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis and contraindications for surgical aortic valve replacement were screened from April 2009 to January 2011 and imaged with TTE and CMR.
Results: Patients who underwent both TTE and CMR (n = 49) had a mean age of 80.8 ± 4.8 years and a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 14.9 ± 9.3%. There was a good correlation between TTE and CMR in terms of annulus size (R2 = 0.48, p < 0.001), left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter (R2 = 0.62, p < 0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (R2 = 0.47, p < 0.001) and a moderate correlation in terms of aortic valve area (AVA) (R2 = 0.24, p < 0.001). CMR generally tended to report larger values than TTE for all measurements. The Bland-Altman test indicated that the 95% limits of agreement between TTE and CMR ranged from -5.6 mm to + 1.0 mm for annulus size, from -0.45 mm to + 0.25 mm for LVOT, from -0.45 mm2 to + 0.25 mm2 for AVA and from -29.2% to 13.2% for LVEF.
Conclusions: In elderly patients candidates to TAVI, CMR represents a viable complement to transthoracic echocardiography.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Quantitative assessment of paravalvular regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 May 8;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0134-0. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015. PMID: 25953135 Free PMC article.
-
Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact of 2D-transthoracic echocardiography versus 3D-transesophageal echocardiography.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Dec;30(8):1549-57. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0510-0. Epub 2014 Aug 8. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014. PMID: 25102782
-
Assessment of the aortic annulus by multislice computed tomography, contrast aortography, and trans-thoracic echocardiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May 1;77(6):868-75. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22761. Epub 2011 Apr 14. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. PMID: 20824762
-
Evaluation of aortic stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review & meta-analysis.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Jun 15;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00633-z. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020. PMID: 32536342 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-operative aortic valve implantation evaluation: multimodality imaging.EuroIntervention. 2010 May;6 Suppl G:G38-47. EuroIntervention. 2010. PMID: 20542827 Review.
Cited by
-
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a reliable alternative to cardiovascular computed tomography and transesophageal echocardiography for aortic annulus valve sizing.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Aug;32(8):1255-63. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0899-8. Epub 2016 Apr 27. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 27117264
-
Aortic valvular imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: seeking for comprehensiveness.Br J Radiol. 2019 Sep;92(1101):20170868. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170868. Epub 2019 Jul 18. Br J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30277407 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2012.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Sep 4;15(1):76. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-76. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013. PMID: 24006874 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ferumoxytol MRA for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning with renal insufficiency.Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 15;231:255-257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.147. Epub 2016 Dec 30. Int J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28100426 Free PMC article.
-
Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is equal to contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography for correct aortic sizing before transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Mar;105(3):273-8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0920-6. Epub 2015 Sep 22. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26395021
References
-
- Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Brown DL, Block PC, Guyton RA, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Douglas PS, Petersen JL, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock S. PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1597–1607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, Iung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quiñones M. American Society of Echocardiography; European Association of Echocardiography. Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Stenosis: EAE/ASE. Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2009;22(1):1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous