Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2012 Jun;19(3):438-47.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9497-2. Epub 2011 Dec 28.

Cardiac risk assessment by gated single-photon emission computed tomography in asymptomatic end-stage renal disease patients at the start of dialysis

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Cardiac risk assessment by gated single-photon emission computed tomography in asymptomatic end-stage renal disease patients at the start of dialysis

Jwa-Kyung Kim et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: This study assessed the impact of cardiac risk assessment using gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) on cardiac events in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.

Methods: We evaluated 215 asymptomatic patients who began dialysis between January 2005 and April 2009. Baseline electrocardiography and echocardiography were performed in all the patients. The subjects were stratified into low- and high-risk groups according to the baseline cardiac status, and gated SPECT was additionally recommended for the high-risk patients.

Results: The study population consisted of 50 low- and 165 high-risk patients undergoing SPECT. Among the high-risk patients, 75 (45.5%) showed perfusion defects on SPECT and their overall cardiac-event rate per person-year of follow-up was 15.0%, significantly higher than 4.5% in high-risk group without perfusion defect and 1.2% in low-risk group. The presence of perfusion defect was a significant independent predictor of adverse cardiac events [hazard ratio (HR) 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-4.24; P = .035]. When gated SPECT was added to the clinical and the echocardiographic variables, the prognostic stratification significantly improved (P < .001). However, coronary revascularization was not associated with improved cardiac event-free survival (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.26-1.52; P = .296).

Conclusions: Gated SPECT may provide additional prognostic information for cardiac risk stratification, particularly among high-risk patients starting dialysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram. From January 2005 to April 2009, 329 ESRD patients started dialysis and 215 included in our study. *High-risk group was defined as patients >50 years of age, diabetes >10 years, a prior history of CAD or an abnormal electrocardiogram (excluding LV hypertrophy and electrolyte imbalance), decreased LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% or regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) on echocardiography, and having 2 or more traditional CAD risk factors. ESRD, end-stage renal disease; F/U, follow-up; ECG, electrocardiography; CAG, coronary angiography; CAD, coronary artery disease; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier estimates for the occurrence of cardiac events in low (n = 50)- and high (n = 165)-risk patients. Among high-risk patients, the presence of perfusion defect was closely associated with adverse cardiac outcomes (HR 3.16; 95% CI 1.65-6.04, P = .001) (A) and the presence of CAD significantly increased the risk of cardiac events (HR 1.94 95% CI 1.38-2.71, P < .001) (B)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier analysis of the cardiac event rate in high-risk patients with significant CAD. Revascularization therapy did not improve cardiac events-free survival (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.26-1.52; P = .296)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Incremental prognostic value of SPECT over baseline (clinical only) and baseline plus 2D echocardiographic variables; upper global chi-square, lower ROC curve analysis

Comment in

References

    1. Baig SZ, Coats WC, Aggarwal KB, Alpert MA. Assessing cardiovascular disease in the dialysis patient. Adv Perit Dial. 2009;25:147–154. - PubMed
    1. Tonelli M, Wiebe N, Culleton B, House A, Rabbat C, Fok M, et al. Chronic kidney disease and mortality risk: A systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2034–2047. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005101085. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1296–1305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;49:S12–S154. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.12.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruilope LM. The Framingham risk score is valuable in Europeans. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6:14–15. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2009.205. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms