Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2011 Dec 28:11:121.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-121.

The effect of systematic pediatric care on neonatal mortality and hospitalizations of infants born with oral clefts

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

The effect of systematic pediatric care on neonatal mortality and hospitalizations of infants born with oral clefts

George L Wehby et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) increase mortality and morbidity risks for affected infants especially in less developed countries. This study aimed at assessing the effects of systematic pediatric care on neonatal mortality and hospitalizations of infants with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) in South America.

Methods: The intervention group included live-born infants with isolated or associated CL/P in 47 hospitals between 2003 and 2005. The control group included live-born infants with CL/P between 2001 and 2002 in the same hospitals. The intervention group received systematic pediatric care between the 7th and 28th day of life. The primary outcomes were mortality between the 7th and 28th day of life and hospitalization days in this period among survivors adjusted for relevant baseline covariates.

Results: There were no significant mortality differences between the intervention and control groups. However, surviving infants with associated CL/P in the intervention group had fewer hospitalization days by about six days compared to the associated control group.

Conclusions: Early systematic pediatric care may significantly reduce neonatal hospitalizations of infants with CL/P and additional birth defects in South America. Given the large healthcare and financial burden of CL/P on affected families and the relatively low cost of systematic pediatric care, improving access to such care may be a cost-effective public policy intervention.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00097149.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, Dixon MJ, Shaw WC. Cleft lip and palate. Lancet. 2009;374(9703):1773–1785. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moreno LM, Mansilla MA, Bullard SA, Cooper ME, Busch TD, Machida J, Johnson MK, Brauer D, Krahn K, Daack-Hirsch S. et al.FOXE1 association with both isolated cleft lip with or without cleft palate, and isolated cleft palate. Human molecular genetics. 2009;18(24):4879–4896. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp444. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lidral AC, Moreno LM, Bullard SA. Genetic Factors and Orofacial Clefting. Semin Orthod. 2008;14(2):103–114. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2008.02.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lidral AC, Moreno LM. Progress toward discerning the genetics of cleft lip. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005;17(6):731–739. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000185138.65820.7f. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dixon MJ, Marazita ML, Beaty TH, Murray JC. Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(3):167–178. doi: 10.1038/nrg2933. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data