Fetal movement counting improved identification of fetal growth restriction and perinatal outcomes--a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial
- PMID: 22205952
- PMCID: PMC3244397
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028482
Fetal movement counting improved identification of fetal growth restriction and perinatal outcomes--a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Fetal movement counting is a method used by the mother to quantify her baby's movements, and may prevent adverse pregnancy outcome by a timely evaluation of fetal health when the woman reports decreased fetal movements. We aimed to assess effects of fetal movement counting on identification of fetal pathology and pregnancy outcome.
Methodology: In a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial, 1076 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies from an unselected population were assigned to either perform fetal movement counting from gestational week 28, or to receive standard antenatal care not including fetal movement counting (controls). Women were recruited from nine Norwegian hospitals during September 2007 through November 2009. Main outcome was a compound measure of fetal pathology and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Analysis was performed by intention-to-treat.
Principal findings: The frequency of the main outcome was equal in the groups; 63 of 433 (11.6%) in the intervention group, versus 53 of 532 (10.7%) in the control group [RR: 1.1 95% CI 0.7-1.5)]. The growth-restricted fetuses were more often identified prior to birth in the intervention group than in the control group; 20 of 23 fetuses (87.0%) versus 12 of 20 fetuses (60.0%), respectively, [RR: 1.5 (95% CI 1.0-2.1)]. In the intervention group two babies (0.4%) had Apgar scores <4 at 1 minute, versus 12 (2.3%) in the control group [RR: 0.2 (95% CI 0.04-0.7)]. The frequency of consultations for decreased fetal movement was 71 (13.1%) and 57 (10.7%) in the intervention and control groups, respectively [RR: 1.2 (95% CI 0.9-1.7)]. The frequency of interventions was similar in the groups.
Conclusions: Maternal ability to detect clinically important changes in fetal activity seemed to be improved by fetal movement counting; there was an increased identification of fetal growth restriction and improved perinatal outcome, without inducing more consultations or obstetric interventions.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.govNCT00513942.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Fetal Movement Counting and Perinatal Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):453-462. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003645. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31923063
-
Fetal movement counting--maternal concern and experiences: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.Birth. 2012 Mar;39(1):10-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00508.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9. Birth. 2012. PMID: 22369601 Clinical Trial.
-
Mindfetalness to increase women's awareness of fetal movements and pregnancy outcomes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial including 39 865 women.BJOG. 2020 Jun;127(7):829-837. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16104. Epub 2020 Feb 8. BJOG. 2020. PMID: 31971325 Clinical Trial.
-
Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in women presenting with decreased fetal movements in late pregnancy.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(12):1345-51. doi: 10.3109/00016340903348375. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009. PMID: 19878088
-
Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Feb;28(2):147-54. doi: 10.1080/01443610801912618. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008. PMID: 18393008 Review.
Cited by
-
My Baby's Movements: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to raise maternal awareness of fetal movements during pregnancy study protocol.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2575-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 31752771 Free PMC article.
-
Novel non-invasive in-house fabricated wearable system with a hybrid algorithm for fetal movement recognition.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 13;16(7):e0254560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254560. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34255780 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of formal fetal movement counting on maternal psychological outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Midwifery. 2021 Feb 3;6:10. doi: 10.18332/ejm/145789. eCollection 2022. Eur J Midwifery. 2021. PMID: 35330616 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Temporal patterns in count-to-ten fetal movement charts and their associations with pregnancy characteristics: a prospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Nov 6;12:124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-124. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012. PMID: 23126608 Free PMC article.
-
Fetal Movement Counting Using Optical Fibre Sensors.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;21(1):48. doi: 10.3390/s21010048. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33374272 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Boehm FH, Gabbe SG. Putting it all together. [Review] [9 refs]. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2002;45:1063–1068. - PubMed
-
- Frøen JF. A kick from within - fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care. J Perinat Med. 2004;32:13–24. - PubMed
-
- Heazell AE, Frøen JF. Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28:147–154. - PubMed
-
- O'Sullivan O, Stephen G, Martindale E, Heazell AE. Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movement. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;29:705–710. - PubMed
-
- Sinha D, Sharma A, Nallaswamy V, Jayagopal N, Bhatti N. Obstetric outcome in women complaining of reduced fetal movements. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27:41–43. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical