Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;120(3):412-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.11.006. Epub 2011 Dec 27.

Stopping speech suppresses the task-irrelevant hand

Affiliations

Stopping speech suppresses the task-irrelevant hand

Weidong Cai et al. Brain Lang. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Some situations require one to quickly stop an initiated response. Recent evidence suggests that rapid stopping engages a mechanism that has diffuse effects on the motor system. For example, stopping the hand dampens the excitability of the task-irrelevant leg. However, it is unclear whether this 'global suppression' could apply across wider motor modalities. Here we tested whether stopping speech leads to suppression of the task-irrelevant hand. We used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the primary motor cortex with concurrent electromyography from the hand. We found that when speech was successfully stopped the motor evoked potential from the task-irrelevant hand was significantly reduced compared to when the participant failed to stop speaking, or responded on non stop signal trials, or compared to baseline. This shows that when speech is quickly stopped, there is a broad suppression across the motor system. This has implications for the neural basis of speech control and stuttering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a. A vocal version of the stop-signal task: participants named a letter “T” or “D” (a go signal) on each trial; on 33% of trials, the letter turned red (a stop signal) and participants tried to cancel the vocal response. TMS stimulation was given at 100 ms before average RT on TMS trials. b. Examples of the sound wave for the Go, StopSucc and StopFail trials with TMS stimulation. Note that TMS stimulation induced a sharp but weak audio signal around 400 ms whereas the human sound wave had a large amplitude and long duration. c. A figure-of-eight coil was placed over the left primary motor cortex and EMG was recorded from the right hand. d. MEP on the StopSucc trials was significantly smaller than on the Go, StopFail and baseline TMS trials (all ps < 0.05).

References

    1. Alm PA. Stuttering, emotions, and heart rate during anticipatory anxiety: a critical review. J Fluency Disord. 2004;29(2):123–133. - PubMed
    1. Aron AR, Behrens TE, Smith S, Frank MJ, Poldrack RA. Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. J Neurosci. 2007;27(14):3743–3752. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aron AR, Poldrack RA. Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci. 2006;26(9):2424–2433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aron AR, Verbruggen F. Stop the presses: dissociating a selective from a global mechanism for stopping. Psychological science. 2008;19(11):1146–1153. - PubMed
    1. Badry R, Mima T, Aso T, Nakatsuka M, Abe M, Fathi D, et al. Suppression of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability during the Stop-signal task. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(9):1717–1723. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources