Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state
- PMID: 2220691
- DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81487-8
Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state
Erratum in
- Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993 Oct;104(4):26
Abstract
The surface roughness and the coefficients of friction were measured for sixteen arch wire-bracket combinations. The sample included one rectangular arch wire product from each of the four principal alloy groups and one bracket product from among the stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina inventory. Although subsamples representing both the 0.018-inch and the 0.022-inch slot sizes were evaluated, no differences were observed in their rankings. When tested over a series of eight incident angles, the optical surface roughness of representative stainless steel and alumina brackets averaged 0.148 and 0.193 microns, respectively. After testing at a single angle (82 degree) and referencing a nomogram, the roughness of the stainless steel, cobalt-chromium, beta-titanium, and nickel-titanium arch wire surfaces averaged 0.053, 0.129, 0.137, and 0.247 microns, respectively. When the various arch wire-bracket couples were pressed against an 0.010-inch stainless steel ligature wire at 34 degrees C and otherwise prevailing atmospheric conditions, the coefficients of friction ranged from stainless steel (lowest) to cobalt-chromium, nickel-titanium, and beta-titanium (highest)--regardless of bracket product or slot size. These results corroborated earlier observations in which the same arch wire products were drawn between stainless steel or alumina contact flats. In the current research, the average coefficient of kinetic friction for the stainless steel couple (0.139) was less than that for the stainless steel arch wire against a polycrystalline alumina bracket (0.174).
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states.Angle Orthod. 1991 Winter;61(4):293-302. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0293:COTFCF>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1991. PMID: 1763840
-
Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Aug;98(2):117-26. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70005-W. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990. PMID: 2378317
-
Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70153-2. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995. PMID: 7817958
-
Mechanical properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Aug;96(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90251-5. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989. PMID: 2667330 Review.
-
Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials.Semin Orthod. 1997 Sep;3(3):166-77. doi: 10.1016/s1073-8746(97)80067-9. Semin Orthod. 1997. PMID: 9573878 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of frictional forces between aesthetic orthodontic coated wires and self-ligation brackets.Korean J Orthod. 2014 Jul;44(4):157-67. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.4.157. Epub 2014 Jul 24. Korean J Orthod. 2014. PMID: 25133130 Free PMC article.
-
Vertical and Orovestibular Forces Generated by Beta-Titanium and Stainless-Steel Rectangular Wires in Labial and Fully Customized Lingual Bracket Systems.Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 28;14(19):5632. doi: 10.3390/ma14195632. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34640028 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Diode and Nd:YAG Laser Irradiation on Friction Forces Between Two Types of Ceramic Brackets and Rhodium-Coated Archwires.J Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Mar 14;12:e13. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.13. eCollection 2021. J Lasers Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 34084739 Free PMC article.
-
Frictional resistance in monocrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional and nonconventional elastomeric ligatures.Prog Orthod. 2013 May 23;14:9. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-9. Prog Orthod. 2013. PMID: 24325886 Free PMC article.
-
Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance.Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):177-83. doi: 10.2319/030313-179.1. Epub 2013 Jun 14. Angle Orthod. 2014. PMID: 23767940 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources