Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism
- PMID: 22209495
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.11.001
Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism
Abstract
Introduction: Resorbable screw fixation for orthognathic surgery is widely used in oral and maxillofacial surgery and has several advantages. However, surgeons are concerned about using resorbable screws in orthognathic surgery because of possible postoperative complications such as relapse, screw fracture, and infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability of bicortical resorbable screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for mandibular prognathism.
Materials and methods: This study included 25 patients who underwent mandibular setback surgery fixed with resorbable screws after sagittal split osteotomy at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Seoul National University Dental Hospital. Five resorbable screws (Inion CPS(®), Inion Ltd., Finland) were applied bicortically at each osteotomy site via a transbuccal approach. No rigid intermaxillary fixation was applied on the first postoperative day. Passive mouth opening exercises were allowed, using two light, rubber elastics for guidance. The control group was 25 patients fixed with four titanium screws. The follow-up period was 12-22 months (mean 17.8 months). Postoperative skeletal changes on lateral cephalometric radiographs were analyzed and compared between the two groups preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively.
Results: The average setback was 6.9 mm and no major intraoperative complications occurred. One patient experienced infection immediately after surgery that was controlled uneventfully. The data did not demonstrate any significant difference in postoperative skeletal stability between the two groups. Differences between the immediate postoperative state and 6 months after surgery were not significant. In earlier cases, especially for patients with severe mandibular prognathism, immediate postoperative elastic traction was needed for stable occlusal guidance.
Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that bicortical resorbable screws offer a clinically stable outcome for the fixation of mandibular sagittal split osteotomies in mandibular prognathism. However the resorbable screws showed less stable results vertically than the titanium screws.
Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The stability of mandibular prognathism corrected by bilateral sagittal split osteotomies: a comparison of bi-cortical osteosynthesis and mono-cortical osteosynthesis.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Feb;41(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.10.029. Epub 2011 Nov 29. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22129998
-
Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparison between the hybrid technique for fixation and the conventional plate fixation using an absorbable plate and screws.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jun;42(4):351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 6. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 23838410
-
Segmental stability of resorbable P(L/DL)LA-TMC osteosynthesis versus titanium miniplates in orthognatic surgery.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):e408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Apr 13. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22503082
-
Effect of rigid fixation on orthodontic finishing after mandibular bilateral sagittal split setback: the case for miniplate monocortical fixation.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):e310-21. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.015. Epub 2011 Dec 22. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22197006 Review.
-
Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback.Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1991;6(1):7-18. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1991. PMID: 1940541 Review.
Cited by
-
Overview of innovative advances in bioresorbable plate systems for oral and maxillofacial surgery.Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2018 Aug;54(3):127-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Apr 5. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2018. PMID: 30128060 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Complications of absorbable fixation in maxillofacial surgery: a meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2013 Jun 28;8(6):e67449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067449. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23840705 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between resorbable plates vs. titanium plates for treatment of zygomatic fractures: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Sep;25(3):289-301. doi: 10.1007/s10006-020-00937-5. Epub 2021 Jan 4. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33398647
-
Prevalence of Osteosynthesis Hardware Removal Due to Surgical Site Infections Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2025 May 19;14(10):3558. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103558. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40429555 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and morbidity of biodegradable versus titanium osteosyntheses in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Eur J Oral Sci. 2021 Oct;129(5):e12800. doi: 10.1111/eos.12800. Epub 2021 Jun 15. Eur J Oral Sci. 2021. PMID: 34131965 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources