Cost analysis of two anaesthetic machines: "Primus®" and "Zeus®"
- PMID: 22216974
- PMCID: PMC3283497
- DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-3
Cost analysis of two anaesthetic machines: "Primus®" and "Zeus®"
Abstract
Background: Two anaesthetic machines, the "Primus®" and the "Zeus®" (Draeger AG, Lübeck, Germany), were subjected to a cost analysis by evaluating the various expenses that go into using each machine.
Methods: These expenses included the acquisition, maintenance, training and device-specific accessory costs. In addition, oxygen, medical air and volatile anaesthetic consumption were determined for each machine.
Results: Anaesthesia duration was 278 ± 140 and 208 ± 112 minutes in the Primus® and the Zeus®, respectively. The purchase cost was €3.28 and €4.58 per hour of operation in the Primus® and the Zeus®, respectively. The maintenance cost was €0.90 and €1.20 per hour of operation in the Primus® and the Zeus®, respectively. We found that the O2 cost was €0.015 ± 0.013 and €0.056 ± 0.121 per hour of operation in the Primus® and the Zeus®, respectively. The medical air cost was €0.005 ± 0.003 and €0.016 ± 0.027 per hour of operation in the Primus® and the Zeus®, respectively. The volatile anaesthetic cost was €2.40 ± 2.40 and €4.80 ± 4.80 per hour of operation in the Primus® and the Zeus®, respectively.
Conclusion: This study showed that the "Zeus®" generates a higher cost per hour of operation compared to the "Primus®".
Similar articles
-
The effect of fresh gas flow rate and type of anesthesia machine on time to reach target sevoflurane concentration.BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0294-y. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017. PMID: 28103806 Free PMC article.
-
Time course of inhaled anaesthetic drug delivery using a new multifunctional closed-circuit anaesthesia ventilator. In vitro comparison with a classical anaesthesia machine.Br J Anaesth. 2005 Mar;94(3):306-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei051. Epub 2004 Dec 10. Br J Anaesth. 2005. PMID: 15591326
-
Preparation of the Drager Fabius CE and Drager Zeus anaesthetic machines for patients susceptible to malignant hyperthermia.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 May;29(5):229-34. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328351b521. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012. PMID: 22388705
-
[Nitrous oxide free low-flow anesthesia].Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2000;25(3):60-7. Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2000. PMID: 10920482 Review. German.
-
Propofol. A pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in day case surgery.Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Feb;9(2):168-78. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199609020-00008. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996. PMID: 10172697 Review.
Cited by
-
Reliability of the volatile agent consumption display in the Draeger Primus™ anesthesia machine.J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Oct;29(5):601-4. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9639-6. Epub 2014 Nov 12. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015. PMID: 25388511
-
Agent consumption with the Zeus® in the automated closed circuit anesthesia mode with O2/air mixtures.BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jul 23;7:469. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-469. BMC Res Notes. 2014. PMID: 25056252 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Katoh T, Suguro Y, Kimura T, Ikeda K. Cerebral awakening concentration of sevoflurane and isoflurane predicted during slow and fast alveolar washout. Anesth Analg. 1993;77:1012–1017. - PubMed
-
- Baum J. Low flow anesthesia. Anaesthesist. 1994;43:194–210. - PubMed
-
- Baum J. General anesthesia with high fresh gas flow is safer than "minimal flow"--fact or fiction? Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1994;29:358–360. - PubMed
-
- Hendrickx JF, Cardinael S, Carette R, Lemmens HJ, De Wolf AM. The ideal oxygen/nitrous oxide fresh gas flow sequence with the Anesthesia Delivery Unit machine. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19:274–279. - PubMed
-
- Langbein T, Sonntag H, Trapp D, Hoffmann A, Malms W, Roth EP, Mors V, Zellner R. Volatile anaesthetics and the atmosphere: atmospheric lifetimes and atmospheric effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, desflurane and sevoflurane. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:66–73. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources