Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan 4:13:2.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-2.

Clustering in surgical trials--database of intracluster correlations

Jonathan A Cook  1 , Thomas Bruckner, Graeme S MacLennan, Christoph M Seiler
Affiliations

Clustering in surgical trials--database of intracluster correlations

Jonathan A Cook et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Randomised trials evaluation of surgical interventions are often designed and analysed as if the outcome of individual patients is independent of the surgeon providing the intervention. There is reason to expect outcomes for patients treated by the same surgeon tend to be more similar than those under the care of another surgeon due to previous experience, individual practice, training, and infrastructure. Such a phenomenon is referred to as the clustering effect and potentially impacts on the design and analysis adopted and thereby the required sample size. The aim of this work was to inform trial design by quantifying clustering effects (at both centre and surgeon level) for various outcomes using a database of surgical trials.

Methods: Intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for outcomes from a set of 10 multicentre surgical trials for a range of outcomes and different time points for clustering at both the centre and surgeon level.

Results: ICCs were calculated for 198 outcomes across the 10 trials at both centre and surgeon cluster levels. The number of cases varied from 138 to 1370 across the trials. The median (range) average cluster size was 32 (9 to 51) and 6 (3 to 30) for centre and surgeon levels respectively. ICC estimates varied substantially between outcome type though uncertainty around individual ICC estimates was substantial, which was reflected in generally wide confidence intervals.

Conclusions: This database of surgical trials provides trialists with valuable information on how to design surgical trials. Our data suggests clustering of outcome is more of an issue than has been previously acknowledged. We anticipate that over time the addition of ICCs from further surgical trial datasets to our database will further inform the design of surgical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Roberts C. The implications of variation in outcome between health professionals for the design and analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stat Med. 1999;18(19):2605–2616. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19991015)18:19<2605::AID-SIM237>3.0.CO;2-N. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cook JA, Ramsay CR, Fayers P. Statistical evaluation of learning effects in surgical trials. Clinical Trials. 2004;1(5):421–427. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn042oa. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. CONSORT group. CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. Br Med J. 2004;328(7441):702–708. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberts C, Roberts SA. Design and analysis of clinical trials with clustering effects due to treatment. Clinical Trials. 2005;2(2):152–162. doi: 10.1191/1740774505cn076oa. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walwyn R, Roberts C. Therapist variation within randomised trials of psychotherapy: implications for precision, internal and external validity. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010;19(3):291–315. doi: 10.1177/0962280209105017. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms