Quantitative assessment of nerve echogenicity: comparison of methods for evaluating nerve echogenicity in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow
- PMID: 22217961
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.10.050
Quantitative assessment of nerve echogenicity: comparison of methods for evaluating nerve echogenicity in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow
Abstract
Objective: The objective is to evaluate different methods to assess nerve echogenicity in a quantitative way by comparing a group of patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) and a healthy control group, subsequently selecting the best tests for quantitative assessment of nerve echogenicity.
Methods: We included 56 patients with UNE and 37 healthy controls. High-resolution ultrasonography images of the ulnar nerve at the level of the medial epicondyle were saved in JPEG, TIFF or DICOM format, with a 19 pixels/mm resolution. Hypoechoic fraction was calculated by using 1 manual and 16 automatic thresholding methods.
Results: A significant difference in mean hypoechoic fraction between patients and controls was found using the following automatic thresholding methods: MaxEntropy 82% versus 74% (p < 0.001), RenyiEntropy 80% versus 69% (p < 0.001), Shanbhag 76% versus 68% (p = 0.002), Triangle 45% versus 58% (p = 0.036) and Yen 79% versus 67% (p < 0.001). Of these five tests a significant correlation between hypoechoic fraction and the cross-sectional area was found for: MaxEntropy 0.542 (p < 0.001), RenyiEntropy 0.558 (p < 0.001), Shanbhag 0.219 (p = 0.035) and Yen 0.513 (p < 0.001). The manual thresholding method did not detect a significant difference in hypoechoic fraction between patients and controls, and inter-rater agreement in hypoechoic fraction for manual thresholding was poor.
Conclusion: Quantitative nerve echogenicity assessment can be successfully used to distinguish between a group of patients with UNE and a healthy control group, preferably by using the MaxEntropy, RenyiEntropy or Yen methods.
Significance: Automatic thresholding techniques using the MaxEntropy, RenyiEntropy or Yen methods are the best quantitative tests, and these quantitative measures can probably be used in further studies evaluating echogenicity in mono- and polyneuropathies.
Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Quantitative assessment of peripheral nerve ultrasound echogenicity. A step forward.Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Jul;123(7):1267-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.11.038. Epub 2011 Dec 17. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22182966 No abstract available.
-
Quantitative assessment of nerve echogenicity: a promising research tool?Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Jan;124(1):209. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.04.029. Epub 2012 Jun 18. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013. PMID: 22717681 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Quantitative assessment of nerve echogenicity as an additional tool for evaluation of common fibular neuropathy.Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):874-879. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 11. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016. PMID: 25921024
-
A comparison of ultrasonographic and electrophysiologic 'inching' in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Feb;126(2):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.023. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015. PMID: 24962009
-
Ultrasound evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: correlation with electrophysiological studies.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Sep;48(9):1098-101. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep167. Epub 2009 Jun 30. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009. PMID: 19567661
-
Ultrasonography in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a critical review.Muscle Nerve. 2011 May;43(5):627-35. doi: 10.1002/mus.22019. Muscle Nerve. 2011. PMID: 21484821 Review.
-
Expert consensus on the combined investigation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow using electrodiagnostic tests and nerve ultrasound.Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Sep;132(9):2274-2281. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.04.018. Epub 2021 May 29. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021. PMID: 34229959 Review.
Cited by
-
Cross-sectional area and echo intensity values of peripheral nerves: Ultrasonographic and cadaveric correlation.Ultrasound. 2023 Aug;31(3):213-229. doi: 10.1177/1742271X221139199. Epub 2022 Dec 23. Ultrasound. 2023. PMID: 37538969 Free PMC article.
-
Nerve sonography to detect peripheral nerve involvement in vasculitis syndromes.Neurol Clin Pract. 2016 Aug;6(4):293-303. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000258. Neurol Clin Pract. 2016. PMID: 29443128 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques Used for Peripheral Nerve Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 2;13(5):956. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050956. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36900101 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nerve echogenicity and intranerve CSA variability in high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).J Neurol. 2019 Feb;266(2):468-475. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-9158-3. Epub 2018 Dec 15. J Neurol. 2019. PMID: 30554264
-
Current and future applications of ultrasound imaging in peripheral nerve disorders.World J Radiol. 2020 Jun 28;12(6):101-129. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v12.i6.101. World J Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32742576 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources