Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:781919.
doi: 10.1155/2011/781919. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

Comparison of direct fluorescence assay and real-time rt-PCR as diagnostics for respiratory syncytial virus in young children

Affiliations

Comparison of direct fluorescence assay and real-time rt-PCR as diagnostics for respiratory syncytial virus in young children

Caroline F Shafik et al. J Trop Med. 2011.

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the major cause of lower respiratory tract infections in children worldwide. Early detection of RSV is critical to initiate proper care. Two methods, the direct fluorescence assay (DFA) and the real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rt-RT-PCR), that are used for RSV detection were compared. A total of 451 nasopharyngeal aspirates from children 5 years of age or less were tested for RSV using both methods. The overall prevalence rate of the RSV among the children was 23.7% with a significantly higher prevalence among children under the age of 6 months of age when compared to other age groups. The sensitivity of DFA in comparison to rt-RT-PCR was highest (86%) during the first 3 days of symptoms onset and decreased gradually till it reached 65% after the first week. The specificity of DFA in comparison to rt-RT-PCR ranged between 99 and 100% irrespective of the date of collection. We concluded that, although the rt-RT-PCR is more sensitive for RSV detection, the DFA offers a reliable point-of-care alternative detection method especially during the first few days of illness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Age distribution of the RSV-positive patients. *Statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
RSV-positive samples detected by each method at different times after onset of symptoms. SEN: sensitivity of DFA, SPEC: specificity of DFA, PPV: positive predictive value, and NPV: negative predictive value.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miller S. A community health concern: respiratory syncytial virus and children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2010;25(6):551–554. - PubMed
    1. Thorburn K, Harigopal S, Reddy V, Taylor N, van Saene HKF. High incidence of pulmonary bacterial co-infection in children with severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis. Thorax. 2006;61(7):611–615. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reis AD, Fink MCD, Machado CM, et al. Comparison of direct immunofluorescence, conventional cell culture and polymerase chain reaction techniques for detecting respiratory syncytial virus in nasopharyngeal aspirates from infants. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo. 2008;50(1):37–40. - PubMed
    1. Di Carlo P, Romano A, Salsa L, et al. Epidemiological assessment of respiratory syncytial virus infection in hospitalized infants, during the season 2005-2006 in Palermo, Italy. Italian Journal of Pediatrics. 2009;35(1, article 11) - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources