Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;12(4):489-95.
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.1.1962.

Physician and nurse acceptance of technicians to screen for geriatric syndromes in the emergency department

Affiliations

Physician and nurse acceptance of technicians to screen for geriatric syndromes in the emergency department

Christopher R Carpenter et al. West J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate emergency medicine physician and nurse acceptance of nonnurse, nonphysician screening for geriatric syndromes.

Methods: This was a single-center emergency department (ED) survey of physicians and nurses after an 8-month project. Geriatric technicians were paid medical student research assistants evaluating consenting ED patients older than 65 years for cognitive dysfunction, fall risk, or functional decline. The primary objective of this anonymous survey was to evaluate ED nurse and physician perceptions about the geriatric screener feasibility and barriers to implementation. In addition, as a secondary objective, respondents reported ongoing geriatric screening efforts independent of the research screeners.

Results: The survey was completed by 72% of physicians and 33% of nurses. Most nurses and physicians identified geriatric technicians as beneficial to patients without impeding ED throughput. Fewer than 25% of physicians routinely screen for any geriatric syndromes. Nurses evaluated for fall risk significantly more often than physicians, but no other significant differences were noted in ongoing screening efforts.

Conclusion: Dedicated geriatric technicians are perceived by nurses and physicians as beneficial to patients with the potential to improve patient safety and clinical outcomes. Most nurses and physicians are not currently screening for any geriatric syndromes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources, and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. Dr Carpenter was supported by the Washington University Goldfarb Patient Safety Award. None of the other co-authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Perceived difficulty implementing the geriatric technician model. All survey respondents answered this question (physicians = 21, nurses = 34).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Perceived impact of geriatric technician screening on patient safety. All survey respondents answered this question (physicians = 21, nurses = 34).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Perceived impact of geriatric technician screening on overall patient care. All survey respondents answered this question (physicians = 21, nurses = 34).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. [No authors listed]. Who cares for the elderly. The Lancet. 2008;;371:959. - PubMed
    1. Roberts DC, McKay MP, Shaffer A. Increasing rates of emergency department visits for elderly patients in the United States, 1993 to 2003. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;;51:769–774. - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, et al. Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research, and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;;55:780–791. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baum SA, Rubenstein LZ. Old people in the emergency room: age-related differences in emergency department use and care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1987;;35:398–404. - PubMed
    1. Singal BM, Hedges JR, Rousseau EW, et al. Geriatric patient emergency visits, part I: comparison of visits by geriatric and younger patients. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;;21:802–807. - PubMed