Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 Jan 6;14(1):R1.
doi: 10.1186/bcr3082.

Effect of dietary patterns differing in carbohydrate and fat content on blood lipid and glucose profiles based on weight-loss success of breast-cancer survivors

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of dietary patterns differing in carbohydrate and fat content on blood lipid and glucose profiles based on weight-loss success of breast-cancer survivors

Henry J Thompson et al. Breast Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Healthy body weight is an important factor for prevention of breast cancer recurrence. Yet, weight loss and weight gain are not currently included in clinical-practice guidelines for posttreatment of breast cancer. The work reported addresses one of the questions that must be considered in recommending weight loss to patients: does it matter what diet plan is used, a question of particular importance because breast cancer treatment can increase risk for cardiovascular disease.

Methods: Women who completed treatment for breast cancer were enrolled in a nonrandomized, controlled study investigating effects of weight loss achieved by using two dietary patterns at the extremes of macronutrient composition, although both diet arms were equivalent in protein: high fat, low carbohydrate versus low fat, high carbohydrate. A nonintervention group served as the control arm; women were assigned to intervention arms based on dietary preferences. During the 6-month weight-loss program, which was menu and recipe defined, participants had monthly clinical visits at which anthropometric data were collected and fasting blood was obtained for safety monitoring for plasma lipid profiles and fasting glucose. Results from 142 participants are reported.

Results: Adverse effects on fasting blood lipids or glucose were not observed in either dietary arm. A decrease in fasting glucose was observed with progressive weight loss and was greater in participants who lost more weight, but the effect was not statistically significant, even though it was observed across both diet groups (P = 0.21). Beneficial effects of weight loss on cholesterol (4.7%; P = 0.001), triglycerides (21.8%; P = 0.01), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (5.8%; P = 0.06) were observed in both groups. For cholesterol (P = 0.07) and LDL cholesterol (P = 0.13), greater reduction trends were seen on the low-fat diet pattern; whereas, for triglycerides (P = 0.01) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (P = 0.08), a decrease or increase, respectively, was greater on the low-carbohydrate diet pattern.

Conclusions: Because an individual's dietary preferences can affect dietary adherence and weight-loss success, the lack of evidence of a negative effect of dietary pattern on biomarkers associated with cardiovascular risk is an important consideration in the development of breast cancer practice guidelines for physicians who recommend that their patients lose weight. Whether dietary pattern affects biomarkers that predict long-term survival is a primary question in this ongoing clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of weight loss and diet on plasma triglycerides. Estimated slopes for predicted triglycerides (TGs) based on a repeated-measures model by group and whether weight loss was below or above the mean for the study population. Slope is the estimated monthly change in TGs. All slopes are significantly different from 0, with the exception of the control group. The Hochberg step-up procedure was used to adjust P values for multiple comparisons within each marker. Averaging over diet, the high- versus low-weight-loss slopes are different from each other (P = 0.01); with averaging over weight loss, the low-fat versus low-carbohydrate slopes are different from each other (P = 0.01), and within the low-carbohydrate diet, the high-weight-loss slope is significantly different from the low-weight-loss slope (P = 0.01). LFLWL, Low-fat low weight loss; LFHWL, low-fat high weight loss; LCLWL, low-carbohydrate low weight loss; LCHWL, low-carbohydrate high weight loss.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ballard-Barbash R. Anthropometry and breast cancer, body size: a moving target. Cancer. 1994;14:1090–100. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940801)74:3+<1090::AID-CNCR2820741518>3.0.CO;2-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daling JR, Malone KE, Doody DR, Johnson LG, Gralow JR, Porter PL. Relation of body mass index to tumor markers and survival among young women with invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;14:720–9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4<720::AID-CNCR1375>3.0.CO;2-T. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goodwin PJ, Boyd NF. Body size and breast cancer prognosis: a critical review of the evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1990;14:205–14. doi: 10.1007/BF01806329. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang Z, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Manson JE, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hankinson SE. Waist circumference, waist:hip ratio, and risk of breast cancer in the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;14:1316–24. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009963. - DOI - PubMed
    1. La Vecchia C, Negri E, Franceschi S, Talamini R, Bruzzi P, Palli D, Decarli A. Body mass index and post-menopausal breast cancer: an age-specific analysis. Br J Cancer. 1997;14:441–4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.73. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types