Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;1(1):6-12.
doi: 10.1016/S0973-6883(11)60110-2.

Circulating CYFRA 21-1 is a Specific Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Biliary Tract Cancer

Affiliations

Circulating CYFRA 21-1 is a Specific Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Biliary Tract Cancer

Michael H Chapman et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) has a poor prognosis, in part related to difficulties in diagnosis. Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) is a constituent of the intermediate filament proteins of epithelial cells. CK19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1) are rarely identified in the blood of healthy individuals. We assessed the utility of CYFRA 21-1 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker of BTC. METHODS: Blood was prospectively collected from patients with benign biliary disease (n = 39), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 19), PSC-related cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6) and sporadic BTC (n = 60). CYFRA 21-1 levels were measured in duplicate by ELISA. RESULTS: CYFRA 21-1 (≥ 1.5 ng/mL) had a sensitivity of 56% and specificity of 88%, compared with figures of 79% and 78% for CA 19-9 (≥ 37U/mL). Using a higher cut-off of 3 ng/mL, CYFRA 21-1 had a sensitivity of 30% and specificity of 97%. Combination of CYFRA 21-1 (≥ 1.5 ng/mL) and CA 19-9 (≥ 37 U/mL) resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 45% and 96%. In contrast to CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1 (≥ 3.0 ng/mL) alone was a strong predictor of prognosis (median survival 2 months vs 10 months, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Elevated circulating CYFRA 21-1 is a specific, but less sensitive diagnostic marker than CA 19-9, predicts a poor outcome and may act as a surrogate marker of circulating tumor cells in BTC. Further prospective studies of its utility in assessing operability and response to chemotherapy are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bergquist A, Ekbom A, Olsson R. Hepatic and extrahepatic malignancies in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2002;36:321–327. - PubMed
    1. Chalasani N, Baluyut A, Ismail A. Cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a multicenter case-control study. Hepatology. 2000;31:7–11. - PubMed
    1. Fisher A, Theise ND, Min A. CA 19-9 does not predict cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Transpl Surg. 1995;1:94–98. - PubMed
    1. Patel AH, Harnois DM, Klee GG, LaRusso NF, Gores GJ. The utility of CA 19-9 in the diagnoses of cholangiocarcinoma in patients without primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:204–207. - PubMed
    1. Siqueira E, Schoen RE, Silverman W. Detecting cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastrointest Endose. 2002;56:40–47. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources