Effect of cavity preparation techniques and different preheating procedures on microleakage of class V resin restorations
- PMID: 22229012
- PMCID: PMC3252811
Effect of cavity preparation techniques and different preheating procedures on microleakage of class V resin restorations
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the extent of microleakage of a single type of composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Posterior, Kuraray, Osaka, Japan) following different preheating procedures in Class V cavities prepared with a diamond bur or Er:YAG (erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet) laser.
Methods: The study randomly divided 72 permanent molar teeth divided into eight groups (n = 9): G1: Diamond bur-unheated composite resin (room temperature-24 ºC); G2: Diamond bur-composite preheated to 37 ºC; G3: Diamond bur-composite preheated to 54 ºC; G4: Diamond bur-composite preheated to 68 ºC; G5: Er:YAG laser-unheated composite resin (room temperature-24 ºC); G6: Er:YAG laser-composite preheated to 37 ºC; G7: Er:YAG laser-composite preheated to 54 ºC; and G8: Er:YAG laser-composite preheated to 68 ºC. The specimens were subjected to a thermal cycling regimen of 5000 cycles between 5 and 55 ºC; then they were immersed in a solution of 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours. The dyed specimens were sectioned in the buccolingual direction and dye penetration was scored in a blinded manner using a five-point qualitative scale. Microleakage scores were analyzed with the Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon tests.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the microleakages of composite applied to cavities prepared by either the Er:YAG laser or diamond bur (P>.05). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the enamel and dentin in all restorations (P<.001). However, there were no significant differences among the preheated groups (P>.05).
Conclusions: For all groups, microleakage values were higher at gingival margins than at occlusal margins. The use of the Er:YAG laser at different preheating procedures did not influence the marginal sealing in Class V composite resin restorations.
Keywords: Er:YAG laser; microleakage; preheated composite resin.
Figures
References
-
- Burgess JO. Dental materials for the restoration of root surface caries. Am J Dent. 1995;8:342–351. - PubMed
-
- Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater. 1992;8:290–295. - PubMed
-
- Htang A, Ohsawa M, Matsumoto H. Fatigue resistance of composite restorations: effect of filler content. Dent Mater. 1995;11:7–13. - PubMed
-
- Carvalho RM, Yoshiyama M, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. In vitro study on the dimensional changes of human dentine after demineralization. Arch Oral Biol. 1996;41:369–377. - PubMed
-
- Strassler HE, Trushkowsky RD. Predictable restoration of Class 2 preparations with composite resin. Dent Today. 2004;23:93–99. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous