Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;6(1):87-94.

Effect of cavity preparation techniques and different preheating procedures on microleakage of class V resin restorations

Affiliations

Effect of cavity preparation techniques and different preheating procedures on microleakage of class V resin restorations

Emine Sirin Karaarslan et al. Eur J Dent. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the extent of microleakage of a single type of composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Posterior, Kuraray, Osaka, Japan) following different preheating procedures in Class V cavities prepared with a diamond bur or Er:YAG (erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet) laser.

Methods: The study randomly divided 72 permanent molar teeth divided into eight groups (n = 9): G1: Diamond bur-unheated composite resin (room temperature-24 ºC); G2: Diamond bur-composite preheated to 37 ºC; G3: Diamond bur-composite preheated to 54 ºC; G4: Diamond bur-composite preheated to 68 ºC; G5: Er:YAG laser-unheated composite resin (room temperature-24 ºC); G6: Er:YAG laser-composite preheated to 37 ºC; G7: Er:YAG laser-composite preheated to 54 ºC; and G8: Er:YAG laser-composite preheated to 68 ºC. The specimens were subjected to a thermal cycling regimen of 5000 cycles between 5 and 55 ºC; then they were immersed in a solution of 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours. The dyed specimens were sectioned in the buccolingual direction and dye penetration was scored in a blinded manner using a five-point qualitative scale. Microleakage scores were analyzed with the Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon tests.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the microleakages of composite applied to cavities prepared by either the Er:YAG laser or diamond bur (P>.05). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the enamel and dentin in all restorations (P<.001). However, there were no significant differences among the preheated groups (P>.05).

Conclusions: For all groups, microleakage values were higher at gingival margins than at occlusal margins. The use of the Er:YAG laser at different preheating procedures did not influence the marginal sealing in Class V composite resin restorations.

Keywords: Er:YAG laser; microleakage; preheated composite resin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Degree of penetration between restoration and tooth.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Stereomicroscopic image of cavity prepared with bur.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Stereomicroscopic image of cavity prepared with laser.

References

    1. Burgess JO. Dental materials for the restoration of root surface caries. Am J Dent. 1995;8:342–351. - PubMed
    1. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater. 1992;8:290–295. - PubMed
    1. Htang A, Ohsawa M, Matsumoto H. Fatigue resistance of composite restorations: effect of filler content. Dent Mater. 1995;11:7–13. - PubMed
    1. Carvalho RM, Yoshiyama M, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. In vitro study on the dimensional changes of human dentine after demineralization. Arch Oral Biol. 1996;41:369–377. - PubMed
    1. Strassler HE, Trushkowsky RD. Predictable restoration of Class 2 preparations with composite resin. Dent Today. 2004;23:93–99. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources