Quantifying the learning curve in the use of a novel vascular closure device: an analysis of the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) CathPCI registry
- PMID: 22230153
- PMCID: PMC11992667
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.017
Quantifying the learning curve in the use of a novel vascular closure device: an analysis of the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) CathPCI registry
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to quantify the learning curve for the safety and effectiveness of a newly introduced vascular closure device through evaluation of the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) CathPCI clinical outcomes registry.
Background: The impact of learning on the clinical outcomes complicates the assessment of the safety and efficacy during the early experience with newly introduced medical devices.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the relationship between cumulative institutional experience and clinical device success, defined as device deployment success and freedom from any vascular complications, for the StarClose vascular closure device (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, California). Generalized estimating equation modeling was used to develop risk-adjusted clinical success predictions that were analyzed to quantify learning curve rates.
Results: A total of 107,710 procedures used at least 1 StarClose deployment, between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007, with overall clinical success increasing from 93% to 97% during the study period. The learning curve was triphasic, with an initial rapid learning phase, followed by a period of declining rates of success, followed finally by a recovery to a steady-state rate of improved device success. The rates of learning were influenced positively by diagnostic (vs. percutaneous coronary intervention) procedure use and teaching status and were affected inversely by annual institutional volume.
Conclusions: An institutional-level learning curve for the initial national experience of StarClose was triphasic, likely indicating changes in patient selection and expansion of number of operators during the initial phases of device adoption. The rate of learning was influenced by several institutional factors, including overall procedural volume, utilization for percutaneous coronary intervention procedures, and teaching status.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors report no conflicts of interest in connection with this research study.
Figures
References
-
- Ramsay CR, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT, Grant AM. Assessing the learning curve effect in health technologies. Lessons from the nonclinical literature. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002;18:1–10. - PubMed
-
- Zhang X, Tanigawa N. Learning curve of laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer, a laparoscopic distal gastrectomy-based analysis. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1259–64. - PubMed
-
- Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P. Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1371–8; discussion 8–9. - PubMed
-
- Forbes TL, Chu MW, Lawlor DK, DeRose G, Harris KA. Learning curve analysis of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in relation to credentialing guidelines. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:218–22. - PubMed
-
- Balzer JO, Scheinert D, Diebold T, Haufe M, Vogl TJ, Biamino G. Postinterventional transcutaneous suture of femoral artery access sites in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a study of 930 patients. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2001;53:174–81. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
