Pupil-BLAH-metry: cognitive effort in speech planning reflected by pupil dilation
- PMID: 22231605
- PMCID: PMC5543177
- DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0263-y
Pupil-BLAH-metry: cognitive effort in speech planning reflected by pupil dilation
Abstract
In reading research, a longstanding question is whether any stages of lexical processing require central attention, and whether such potential demands are frequency-sensitive. In the present study, we examined the allocation of cognitive effort in lexical processing by examining pupil dilations and naming latencies in a modified delayed naming procedure. In this dual-task/change procedure, participants read words and waited for various delays before being signaled to issue a response. On most trials (80%), participants issued a standard naming response. On the remaining trials, they were cued to abandon the original speech plan, saying "blah" instead, thereby equating production across different words. Using feature-matched low- and high-frequency words, we observed the differences in pupil dilations as a function of word frequency. Indeed, frequency-sensitive cognitive demands were seen in word processing, even after naming responses were issued. The results suggest that word perception and/or speech planning requires the frequency-sensitive allocation of cognitive resources.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1187-99. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002. PMID: 12450341 Free PMC article.
-
Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Aug;56(4):1156-65. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0058). Epub 2013 Jun 19. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013. PMID: 23785182
-
Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):498-510. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21233711
-
Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Mar;34(2):353-68. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.353. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008. PMID: 18315411
-
Both a Gauge and a Filter: Cognitive Modulations of Pupil Size.Front Neurol. 2019 Jan 22;9:1190. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01190. eCollection 2018. Front Neurol. 2019. PMID: 30723454 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518800869. doi: 10.1177/2331216518800869. Trends Hear. 2018. PMID: 30261825 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Auditory attention switching with listening difficulty: Behavioral and pupillometric measures.J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Nov;144(5):2764. doi: 10.1121/1.5078618. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018. PMID: 30522295 Free PMC article.
-
Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan;50(1):23-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01477.x. Epub 2012 Nov 15. Psychophysiology. 2013. PMID: 23157603 Free PMC article.
-
A pupil size, eye-tracking and neuropsychological dataset from ADHD children during a cognitive task.Sci Data. 2019 Apr 11;6(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0037-2. Sci Data. 2019. PMID: 30975993 Free PMC article.
-
Second language experience modulates word retrieval effort in bilinguals: evidence from pupillometry.Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 21;5:137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00137. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24600428 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andrews S. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1989;15:802–814. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802. - DOI
-
- Andrews S. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1992;2:234–254. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.234. - DOI
-
- Balota DA, Chumbley JI. The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory and Language. 1985;24:89–106. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90017-8. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources