Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 22;104(4):326-39.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr531. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

Estrogen metabolism and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Affiliations

Estrogen metabolism and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Barbara J Fuhrman et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: Estrogens are recognized causal factors in breast cancer. Interindividual variation in estrogen metabolism may also influence the risk of breast cancer and could provide clues to mechanisms of breast carcinogenesis. Long-standing hypotheses about how estrogen metabolism might influence breast cancer have not been adequately evaluated in epidemiological studies because of the lack of accurate, reproducible, and high-throughput assays for estrogen metabolites.

Methods: We conducted a prospective case-control study nested within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO). Participants included 277 women who developed invasive breast cancer (case subjects) and 423 matched control subjects; at PLCO baseline, all subjects were aged 55-74 years, postmenopausal and not using hormone therapy, and provided a blood sample. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure serum concentrations of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites, in unconjugated and conjugated forms, including the parent estrogens, estrone and estradiol, and estrogen metabolites in pathways defined by irreversible hydroxylation at the C-2, C-4, or C-16 positions of the steroid ring. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) approximating risk in highest vs lowest deciles of individual estrogens and estrogen metabolites, estrogens and estrogen metabolites grouped by metabolic pathways, and metabolic pathway ratios using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Nearly all estrogens, estrogen metabolites, and metabolic pathway groups were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; the serum concentration of unconjugated estradiol was strongly associated with the risk of breast cancer (HR = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 3.62). No estrogen, estrogen metabolite, or metabolic pathway group remained statistically significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer after adjusting for unconjugated estradiol. The ratio of the 2-hydroxylation pathway to parent estrogens (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.87) and the ratio of 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols to 4-hydroxylation pathway methylated catechols (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.72) were statistically significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer and remained so after adjustment for unconjugated estradiol.

Conclusions: More extensive 2-hydroxylation of parent estrogens is associated with lower risk, and less extensive methylation of potentially genotoxic 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols is associated with higher risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pathways of estrogen metabolism. Adapted from Ziegler et al. (2) and reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives. The estrogen metabolites are formed by irreversible hydroxylation of the parent estrogens, estrone and estradiol, at the C-2, C-4, or C-16 positions of the steroid ring. The relative size of the chemical structure indicates the relative concentration of the estrogen or estrogen metabolite in serum of postmenopausal women. The structures are for the unconjugated forms of estrogens and estrogen metabolites.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots of hazard ratios (HRs) for invasive breast cancer and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by quintiles of unconjugated estradiol, total estrogens and estrogen metabolites, and selected metabolic pathway ratios. HRs (black rectangles) are shown on a log scale. Gray lines represent 95% CIs. Quintiles are abbreviated Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, and Q5 and were defined based on distributions of these measures among control subjects weighted to represent the study cohort. Models shown on the right-hand side were adjusted for log-transformed (to the base 1.2) continuous unconjugated estradiol. All models were adjusted for age at study entry: 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74 years; period of blood collection: January 26, 1994, to September 29, 1997, September 30, 1997, to October 17, 2001; age at menarche: <12, 12–13 or missing, ≥14 years; combined parity and age at birth of first child: nulliparous, ≥1 live birth and age <20 years, 1–2 live births and age 20–29 years, ≥3 live births and age 20–29 years or missing parity or missing age, ≥1 live birth and age ≥30 years; age at natural menopause: <45, 45–49, 50–54, ≥55 years, missing; type of menopause: natural menopause, surgical menopause with both ovaries removed, other or missing; first-degree family history of breast cancer: yes, no or missing; personal history of benign breast disease: yes, no or missing; previous use of menopausal hormone therapy: former, never. P for trend was based on two-sided Wald tests of the coefficient associated with a unit increase in log1.2-transformed unconjugated estradiol, in log1.2-transformed total estrogens and estrogen metabolites, or in log1.04-transformed metabolic pathway ratios.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of estimated absolute risks of breast cancer (expressed as incidence rates, in cases per 105 person-years) for each study control subject. Estimated risks were based on relative hazard (Cox) models for the estrogen and estrogen metabolite profile of each control subject. One model included unconjugated estradiol only (x-axis), and the other model included both unconjugated estradiol and an additional measure of interest (y-axis): total estrogens and estrogen metabolites (A); the ratio of the 2-hydroxylation pathway to parent estrogens (B); the ratio of the 2-hydroxylation pathway to the 16-hydroxylation pathway (C); and the ratio of 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols to 4-hydroxylation pathway methylated catechols (D). Absolute risk estimates were calibrated using breast cancer incidence rates for white women, aged 60–64 years, in the 2004–2006 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population (357 cases per 105 person-years), as described in the “Methods” section. Each dot represents two estimated absolute risks for each control subject. If the two risks are equal, they will fall on a diagonal line. Upper and lower dashed lines demarcate risk predictions that differ by at least 50 cases per 105 person-years. To estimate relative hazards from Cox models, estrogen and estrogen metabolism measures were log-transformed and the following covariates were included: age at study entry: 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74 years; period of blood collection: January 26, 1994, to September 29, 1997, September 30, 1997, to October 17, 2001; age at menarche: <12, 12–13 or missing, ≥14 years; combined parity and age at birth of first child: nulliparous, ≥1 live birth and age <20 years, 1–2 live births and age 20–29 years, ≥3 live births and age 20–29 years or missing parity or missing age, ≥1 live birth and age ≥30 years; age at natural menopause: <45, 45–49, 50–54, ≥55 years, missing; type of menopause: natural menopause, surgical menopause with both ovaries removed, other or missing; first-degree family history of breast cancer: yes, no or missing; personal history of benign breast disease: yes, no or missing; previous use of menopausal hormone therapy: former, never.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Key T, Appleby P, Barnes I, Reeves G. Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(8):606–616. - PubMed
    1. Ziegler RG, Rossi SC, Fears TR, et al. Quantifying estrogen metabolism: an evaluation of the reproducibility and validity of enzyme immunoassays for 2-hydroxyestrone and 16alpha-hydroxyestrone in urine. Environ Health Perspect. 1997;105(suppl 3):607–614. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adlercreutz H, Martin F. Biliary excretion and intestinal metabolism of progesterone and estrogens in man. J Steroid Biochem. 1980;13(2):231–244. - PubMed
    1. Zhu BT, Han GZ, Shim JY, Wen Y, Jiang XR. Quantitative structure-activity relationship of various endogenous estrogen metabolites for human estrogen receptor alpha and beta subtypes: Insights into the structural determinants favoring a differential subtype binding. Endocrinology. 2006;147(9):4132–4150. - PubMed
    1. Stack DE, Byun J, Gross ML, Rogan EG, Cavalieri EL. Molecular characteristics of catechol estrogen quinones in reactions with deoxyribonucleosides. Chem Res Toxicol. 1996;9(5):851–859. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms